BCLYF
Price
$4.96
Change
-$0.07 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
69.8B
HBCYF
Price
$13.03
Change
+$0.32 (+2.52%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
223.71B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCLYF vs HBCYF

Header iconBCLYF vs HBCYF Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs HBCYFBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$4.96
Change-$0.07 (-1.39%)
Volume$22.53K
Capitalization69.8B
HSBC Holdings
Price$13.03
Change+$0.32 (+2.52%)
Volume$54.68K
Capitalization223.71B
BCLYF vs HBCYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. HBCYF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a StrongBuy and HBCYF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $4.97 vs. HBCYF: $13.02)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF and HBCYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 76% vs. HBCYF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $69.8B vs. HBCYF: $223.71B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $69.8B. HBCYF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $223.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHBCYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HBCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the long-term than HBCYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCLYF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBCYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HBCYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the short-term than HBCYF.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а +3.01% price change this week, while HBCYF (@Major Banks) price change was +3.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCYF($224B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($69.8B). HBCYF has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: HBCYF (12.90) vs BCLYF (9.12). BCLYF YTD gains are higher at: 50.000 vs. HBCYF (44.177). BCLYF has less debt than HBCYF: BCLYF (117B) vs HBCYF (130B). HBCYF has higher revenues than BCLYF: HBCYF (69.1B) vs BCLYF (27.8B).
BCLYFHBCYFBCLYF / HBCYF
Capitalization69.8B224B31%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD50.00044.177113%
P/E Ratio9.1212.9071%
Revenue27.8B69.1B40%
Total CashN/A246B-
Total Debt117B130B90%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs HBCYF: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
HBCYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6772
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
156
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4912
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (77). This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (15). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (4). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (45). This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCLYF (49). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCLYFHBCYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIMO82.381.21
+1.49%
Silicon Motion Technology Corp
PCSA0.17N/A
+1.24%
Processa Pharmaceuticals
VSTS4.560.05
+1.11%
Vestis Corp
LAZR1.66-0.03
-1.78%
Luminar Technologies Inc
BURL291.20-10.15
-3.37%
Burlington Stores

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-1.49%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
More

HBCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCYF has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBCYF jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCYF
1D Price
Change %
HBCYF100%
+2.56%
HSBC - HBCYF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
SCBFY - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
SMFNF - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
BCS - HBCYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
BCLYF - HBCYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
More