BCLYF
Price
$3.33
Change
-$0.10 (-2.92%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
30.97B
HBCYF
Price
$9.25
Change
-$0.14 (-1.49%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
163.92B
Ad is loading...

BCLYF vs HBCYF

Header iconBCLYF vs HBCYF Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs HBCYFBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$3.33
Change-$0.10 (-2.92%)
Volume$6.7K
Capitalization30.97B
HSBC Holdings
Price$9.25
Change-$0.14 (-1.49%)
Volume$1.12K
Capitalization163.92B
BCLYF vs HBCYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. HBCYF commentary
Apr 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a Hold and HBCYF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $3.33 vs. HBCYF: $9.25)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF and HBCYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 11% vs. HBCYF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $30.97B vs. HBCYF: $163.92B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $30.97B. HBCYF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $163.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileHBCYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • HBCYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the long-term than HBCYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCLYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.53% price change this week, while HBCYF (@Major Banks) price change was -9.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +4.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +59.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+4.14% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCYF($164B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($31B). HBCYF has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: HBCYF (6.92) vs BCLYF (4.22). HBCYF YTD gains are higher at: 0.698 vs. BCLYF (0.453). HBCYF has less debt than BCLYF: HBCYF (85.4B) vs BCLYF (116B). HBCYF has higher revenues than BCLYF: HBCYF (71.3B) vs BCLYF (25.3B).
BCLYFHBCYFBCLYF / HBCYF
Capitalization31B164B19%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.4530.69865%
P/E Ratio4.226.9261%
Revenue25.3B71.3B35%
Total CashN/A327B-
Total Debt116B85.4B136%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs HBCYF: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
HBCYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2017
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3237
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (45). This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (20). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (3). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (54). This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (37). This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCLYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLTW41.512.46
+6.30%
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
OMFL52.040.87
+1.70%
Invesco Russell 1000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF
PSCU53.410.52
+0.99%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Ult & Comnc Svc ETF
IFN14.460.12
+0.84%
India Fund (The)
INDL53.610.33
+0.62%
Direxion Daily MSCI India Bull 2x ETF

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-3.06%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.21%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.59%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More

HBCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCYF has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBCYF jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCYF
1D Price
Change %
HBCYF100%
-1.49%
HSBC - HBCYF
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.46%
SCBFY - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.83%
SMFNF - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
BCS - HBCYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
BCLYF - HBCYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.06%
More