BCLYF
Price
$5.08
Change
-$0.07 (-1.36%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
72.81B
HBCYF
Price
$13.68
Change
-$0.36 (-2.56%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
242.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCLYF vs HBCYF

Header iconBCLYF vs HBCYF Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs HBCYFBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$5.08
Change-$0.07 (-1.36%)
Volume$3.36K
Capitalization72.81B
HSBC Holdings
Price$13.68
Change-$0.36 (-2.56%)
Volume$14.59K
Capitalization242.19B
BCLYF vs HBCYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. HBCYF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a StrongBuy and HBCYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $5.09 vs. HBCYF: $13.68)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF and HBCYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 12% vs. HBCYF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $72.81B vs. HBCYF: $242.19B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $72.81B. HBCYF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $242.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $861.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHBCYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HBCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the long-term than HBCYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCLYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBCYF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HBCYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCYF is a better buy in the short-term than BCLYF.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.29% price change this week, while HBCYF (@Major Banks) price change was -1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.07% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCYF($242B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($72.8B). HBCYF has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: HBCYF (13.54) vs BCLYF (9.29). BCLYF (53.625) and HBCYF (51.372) have similar YTD gains . BCLYF has less debt than HBCYF: BCLYF (117B) vs HBCYF (130B). HBCYF has higher revenues than BCLYF: HBCYF (69.1B) vs BCLYF (27.8B).
BCLYFHBCYFBCLYF / HBCYF
Capitalization72.8B242B30%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD53.62551.372104%
P/E Ratio9.2913.5469%
Revenue27.8B69.1B40%
Total CashN/A246B-
Total Debt117B130B90%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs HBCYF: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
HBCYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
155
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3911
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (80). This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (15). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (4). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (42). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BCLYF (39). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCLYFHBCYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFWL1.15-0.01
-0.86%
Shengfeng Development Limited
DC4.53-0.06
-1.31%
Dakota Gold Corp
CPHI1.95-0.05
-2.30%
China Pharma Holdings Inc
NBIX140.89-5.78
-3.94%
Neurocrine Biosciences
BBUC32.95-3.00
-8.34%
Brookfield Business Corp

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-1.36%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
More

HBCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCYF has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBCYF jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCYF
1D Price
Change %
HBCYF100%
-2.60%
HSBC - HBCYF
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
SCBFY - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
SMFNF - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
BCS - HBCYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
BCLYF - HBCYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
More