BCLYF
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.29 (-8.12%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
30.97B
ING
Price
$17.36
Change
-$1.64 (-8.63%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
54.32B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCLYF vs ING

Header iconBCLYF vs ING Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs INGBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$3.27
Change-$0.29 (-8.12%)
Volume$11.12K
Capitalization30.97B
ING Groep
Price$17.36
Change-$1.64 (-8.63%)
Volume$6.37M
Capitalization54.32B
BCLYF vs ING Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. ING commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a Hold and ING is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $3.28 vs. ING: $17.36)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF and ING are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 19% vs. ING: 199%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $30.97B vs. ING: $54.32B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $30.97B. ING’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $54.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileING’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCLYF and ING are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCLYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ING’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ING’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ING is a better buy in the short-term than BCLYF.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а -16.03% price change this week, while ING (@Major Banks) price change was -12.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +57.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +57.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+57.67% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ING($54.3B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($31B). ING has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: ING (7.46) vs BCLYF (4.22). ING YTD gains are higher at: 11.974 vs. BCLYF (-1.057). BCLYF has less debt than ING: BCLYF (116B) vs ING (150B). BCLYF has higher revenues than ING: BCLYF (25.3B) vs ING (22.4B).
BCLYFINGBCLYF / ING
Capitalization31B54.3B57%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.05711.974-9%
P/E Ratio4.227.4656%
Revenue25.3B22.4B113%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt116B150B77%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs ING: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
ING
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5088
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2710
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3633
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
956

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as BCLYF (27) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

ING's SMR Rating (3) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as BCLYF (3) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as BCLYF (53) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

ING's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as BCLYF (36) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCLYFING
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSKN2.59-0.03
-1.19%
Strata Skin Sciences
MKL1723.03-104.43
-5.71%
Markel Group
CTGO9.76-0.63
-6.06%
Contango ORE
HEPS2.58-0.17
-6.18%
D-Market Electronic Services & Trading
CXM7.20-0.53
-6.86%
Sprinklr

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-8.26%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
-7.97%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-10.65%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.63%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.77%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.14%
More