Advertisement
BCLYF vs SAN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a Hold and SAN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSAN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- BCLYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SAN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCLYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BCLYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SAN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а -5.76% price change this week, while SAN (@Major Banks) price change was -1.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
SAN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (-0.34% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| BCLYF | SAN | BCLYF / SAN | |
| Capitalization | 31B | 76.7B | 40% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.399 | 80.167 | 35% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.22 | 6.83 | 62% |
| Revenue | 25.3B | 59.9B | 42% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 116B | 311B | 37% |
BCLYF | SAN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BCLYF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAN (61) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAN’s over the last 12 months.
SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (17) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.
SAN's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (3) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.
SAN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (41) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.
SAN's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (48) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.
| BCLYF | SAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
BCLYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCLYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCLYF | 100% | -1.73% | ||
| BCS - BCLYF | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| SAN - BCLYF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.73% | ||
| ING - BCLYF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
| AAVMY - BCLYF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.28% | ||
| WFC - BCLYF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.23% | ||
More | ||||
SAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN | 100% | -1.73% | ||
| BBVA - SAN | 78% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| ING - SAN | 77% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| BCS - SAN | 66% Closely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| HSBC - SAN | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| UBS - SAN | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
More | ||||