BCLYF
Price
$5.14
Change
-$0.11 (-2.10%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
73.13B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAN
Price
$10.28
Change
+$0.11 (+1.08%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
152.33B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCLYF vs SAN

Header iconBCLYF vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs SANBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$5.14
Change-$0.11 (-2.10%)
Volume$96.05K
Capitalization73.13B
Banco Santander SA
Price$10.28
Change+$0.11 (+1.08%)
Volume$2.24M
Capitalization152.33B
BCLYF vs SAN Comparison Chart in %
BCLYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. SAN commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a Hold and SAN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $5.14 vs. SAN: $10.28)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF and SAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 263% vs. SAN: 64%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $73.13B vs. SAN: $152.33B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $73.13B. SAN’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $152.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $825.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $137.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSAN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SAN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the long-term than SAN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCLYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SAN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAN is a better buy in the short-term than BCLYF.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а -4.19% price change this week, while SAN (@Major Banks) price change was -6.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-2.25% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAN($152B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($73.1B). SAN has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: SAN (10.51) vs BCLYF (9.63). SAN YTD gains are higher at: 139.179 vs. BCLYF (55.438). SAN has higher revenues than BCLYF: SAN (63.8B) vs BCLYF (28.5B).
BCLYFSANBCLYF / SAN
Capitalization73.1B152B48%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD55.438139.17940%
P/E Ratio9.6310.5192%
Revenue28.5B63.8B45%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt122BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs SAN: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
SAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7716
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
152
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
339
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as SAN (82) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (15) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (4) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (43) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (33) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCLYFSAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCLYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRIF30.240.15
+0.50%
FIS Bright Portfolios Focused Equity ETF
FDAT21.860.02
+0.11%
Tactical Advantage ETF
IGSB52.880.01
+0.02%
iShares 1-5 Year invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
XTL139.080.01
+0.01%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Telecom ETF
IHF46.94-0.38
-0.80%
iShares US Healthcare Providers ETF

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
-2.00%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More