BCLYF
Price
$4.85
Change
+$0.07 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.97B
SAN
Price
$8.97
Change
+$0.09 (+1.01%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
76.74B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCLYF vs SAN

Header iconBCLYF vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs SANBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$4.85
Change+$0.07 (+1.46%)
Volume$22.75K
Capitalization30.97B
Banco Santander SA
Price$8.97
Change+$0.09 (+1.01%)
Volume$3.2M
Capitalization76.74B
BCLYF vs SAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCLYF vs. SAN commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a Buy and SAN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $4.85 vs. SAN: $8.97)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF and SAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 57% vs. SAN: 50%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $30.97B vs. SAN: $76.74B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $30.97B. SAN’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $76.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSAN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SAN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the long-term than SAN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCLYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCLYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the short-term than SAN.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а +2.75% price change this week, while SAN (@Major Banks) price change was +6.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.60% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAN($76.7B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($31B). SAN has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: SAN (6.83) vs BCLYF (4.22). SAN YTD gains are higher at: 103.283 vs. BCLYF (46.526). BCLYF has less debt than SAN: BCLYF (116B) vs SAN (311B). SAN has higher revenues than BCLYF: SAN (59.9B) vs BCLYF (25.3B).
BCLYFSANBCLYF / SAN
Capitalization31B76.7B40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.526103.28345%
P/E Ratio4.226.8362%
Revenue25.3B59.9B42%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt116B311B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs SAN: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
SAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2921
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
143
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4417
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAN (68) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (14) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (4) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (41) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (44) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCLYFSAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAVA88.021.76
+2.04%
CAVA Group
ITOS10.170.02
+0.20%
iTeos Therapeutics
TNK44.17-0.70
-1.56%
Teekay Tankers Ltd
TIVC4.18-0.20
-4.57%
Tivic Health Systems Inc
XOS3.34-0.17
-4.84%
Xos

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
+1.46%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
SAN - BCLYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
ING - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
More

SAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAN
1D Price
Change %
SAN100%
+1.01%
BBVA - SAN
78%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
ING - SAN
74%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
BCS - SAN
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
HSBC - SAN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
MUFG - SAN
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
More