BCLYF
Price
$2.86
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
SAN
Price
$4.99
Change
-$0.02 (-0.40%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCLYF vs SAN

Header iconBCLYF vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts BCLYF vs SANBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$2.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.68K
CapitalizationN/A
Banco Santander SA
Price$4.99
Change-$0.02 (-0.40%)
Volume$2.9M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BCLYF vs SAN Comparison Chart
Loading...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BCLYF vs. SAN commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCLYF is a Hold and SAN is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BCLYF: $3.27 vs. SAN: $4.99)
Brand notoriety: BCLYF and SAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCLYF: 1238% vs. SAN: 131%
Market capitalization -- BCLYF: $30.97B vs. SAN: $76.74B
BCLYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $30.97B. SAN’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $76.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCLYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCLYF is a better buy in the long-term than SAN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BCLYF (@Major Banks) experienced а +8.46% price change this week, while SAN (@Major Banks) price change was +0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.07% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAN($76.7B) has a higher market cap than BCLYF($31B). SAN has higher P/E ratio than BCLYF: SAN (6.83) vs BCLYF (4.22). BCLYF YTD gains are higher at: 68.037 vs. SAN (23.003). BCLYF has less debt than SAN: BCLYF (116B) vs SAN (311B). SAN has higher revenues than BCLYF: SAN (59.9B) vs BCLYF (25.3B).
BCLYFSANBCLYF / SAN
Capitalization31B76.7B40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD68.03723.003296%
P/E Ratio4.226.8362%
Revenue25.3B59.9B42%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt116B311B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCLYF vs SAN: Fundamental Ratings
BCLYF
SAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3372
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3640
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4263
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCLYF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as SAN (17) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SAN (40) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

SAN's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCLYF (4) in the null industry. This means that SAN’s stock grew similarly to BCLYF’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SAN (49) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

BCLYF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SAN (63) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCLYF’s stock grew similarly to SAN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BCLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCLYF has been loosely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCLYF jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCLYF
1D Price
Change %
BCLYF100%
+5.14%
BCS - BCLYF
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.35%
SAN - BCLYF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
ING - BCLYF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
AAVMY - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
WFC - BCLYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
More