BCOMF
Price
$7.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
651.48M
LILAB
Price
$5.55
Change
-$0.35 (-5.93%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCOMF vs LILAB

Header iconBCOMF vs LILAB Comparison
Open Charts BCOMF vs LILABBanner chart's image
B Communications
Price$7.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization651.48M
Liberty Latin America
Price$5.55
Change-$0.35 (-5.93%)
Volume$245
Capitalization1.34B
BCOMF vs LILAB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCOMF vs. LILAB commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCOMF is a Buy and LILAB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BCOMF: $7.50 vs. LILAB: $5.55)
Brand notoriety: BCOMF and LILAB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCOMF: 47% vs. LILAB: 100%
Market capitalization -- BCOMF: $651.48M vs. LILAB: $1.34B
BCOMF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $651.48M. LILAB’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCOMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLILAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCOMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LILAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCOMF is a better buy in the long-term than LILAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCOMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BCOMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

BCOMF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LILAB (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.92% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LILAB($1.34B) has a higher market cap than BCOMF($651M). BCOMF YTD gains are higher at: 118.023 vs. LILAB (0.000). BCOMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.51B vs. LILAB (826M). BCOMF has more cash in the bank: 4.03B vs. LILAB (576M). LILAB has less debt than BCOMF: LILAB (8.26B) vs BCOMF (11.7B). BCOMF has higher revenues than LILAB: BCOMF (8.86B) vs LILAB (4.44B).
BCOMFLILABBCOMF / LILAB
Capitalization651M1.34B49%
EBITDA3.51B826M425%
Gain YTD118.0230.000-
P/E Ratio26.41N/A-
Revenue8.86B4.44B200%
Total Cash4.03B576M699%
Total Debt11.7B8.26B142%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCOMF vs LILAB: Fundamental Ratings
BCOMF
LILAB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4841
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
9697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3876
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
336
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCOMF's Valuation (64) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LILAB (78) in the null industry. This means that BCOMF’s stock grew similarly to LILAB’s over the last 12 months.

BCOMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for LILAB (100) in the null industry. This means that BCOMF’s stock grew significantly faster than LILAB’s over the last 12 months.

BCOMF's SMR Rating (96) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LILAB (97) in the null industry. This means that BCOMF’s stock grew similarly to LILAB’s over the last 12 months.

BCOMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LILAB (76) in the null industry. This means that BCOMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LILAB’s over the last 12 months.

BCOMF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LILAB (36) in the null industry. This means that BCOMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LILAB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCOMFLILAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BFTIX64.960.28
+0.43%
Baron Fifth Avenue Growth Instl
DVMFX44.16N/A
N/A
Invesco Developing Markets R5
FDEKX75.73N/A
N/A
Fidelity Disciplined Equity K
AIFRX26.25N/A
N/A
abrdn Global Infrastructure Instl
NMUEX11.32N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp E

BCOMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCOMF has been loosely correlated with LILAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCOMF jumps, then LILAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCOMF
1D Price
Change %
BCOMF100%
N/A
LILAB - BCOMF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SGAPY - BCOMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
MTNOF - BCOMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCI - BCOMF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
VOD - BCOMF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
More

LILAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LILAB has been loosely correlated with BCOMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LILAB jumps, then BCOMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LILAB
1D Price
Change %
LILAB100%
N/A
BCOMF - LILAB
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MTNOF - LILAB
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LICT - LILAB
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MYTAY - LILAB
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
KDDIY - LILAB
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
More