BCS
Price
$18.41
Change
-$0.40 (-2.13%)
Updated
Jul 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
34.89B
18 days until earnings call
RBSPF
Price
$6.87
Change
+$0.40 (+6.19%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
30.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCS vs RBSPF

Header iconBCS vs RBSPF Comparison
Open Charts BCS vs RBSPFBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$18.41
Change-$0.40 (-2.13%)
Volume$155.44K
Capitalization34.89B
NatWest Group
Price$6.87
Change+$0.40 (+6.19%)
Volume$3.06K
Capitalization30.53B
BCS vs RBSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCS vs. RBSPF commentary
Jul 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCS is a StrongBuy and RBSPF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BCS: $18.81 vs. RBSPF: $6.86)
Brand notoriety: BCS: Notable vs. RBSPF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCS: 105% vs. RBSPF: 31%
Market capitalization -- BCS: $34.89B vs. RBSPF: $30.53B
BCS [@Major Banks] is valued at $34.89B. RBSPF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $30.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRBSPF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RBSPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCS and RBSPF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBSPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RBSPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the short-term than RBSPF.

Price Growth

BCS (@Major Banks) experienced а +3.01% price change this week, while RBSPF (@Major Banks) price change was +4.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.09% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCS($34.9B) has a higher market cap than RBSPF($30.5B). RBSPF has higher P/E ratio than BCS: RBSPF (10.02) vs BCS (6.84). BCS (44.048) and RBSPF (43.021) have similar YTD gains .
BCSRBSPFBCS / RBSPF
Capitalization34.9B30.5B114%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.04843.021102%
P/E Ratio6.8410.0268%
Revenue25.4BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt177BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCS vs RBSPF: Fundamental Ratings
BCS
RBSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7252
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
117
SMR RATING
1..100
44
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4623
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCS's Valuation (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RBSPF (42) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to RBSPF’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (11) in the Major Banks industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (4) in the Major Banks industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RBSPF (44) in the null industry. This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to RBSPF’s over the last 12 months.

RBSPF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as BCS (46) in the Major Banks industry. This means that RBSPF’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSRBSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAB84.820.66
+0.78%
First Trust Multi Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF
FMAT52.190.36
+0.69%
Fidelity MSCI Materials ETF
ABXB19.520.05
+0.28%
Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF
IBDU23.20N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corp ETF
IDEC30.10-0.04
-0.12%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Dec

RBSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBSPF and TD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBSPF and TD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBSPF
1D Price
Change %
RBSPF100%
+6.27%
TD - RBSPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
BCS - RBSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
ING - RBSPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
NABZY - RBSPF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
INGVF - RBSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More