Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCSAX vs SKNRX
BCSAX vs SKNRX Comparison
Open Charts BCSAX vs SKNRX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Inv A
Price$9.14
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets646.43M
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy A
Price$5.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets891.79M
BCSAX vs SKNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCSAX vs. SKNRX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCSAX is a Buy and SKNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKNRX has more cash in the bank: 892M vs. BCSAX (646M). SKNRX pays higher dividends than BCSAX: SKNRX (3.24) vs BCSAX (3.03). BCSAX was incepted earlier than SKNRX: BCSAX (14 years) vs SKNRX (20 years). SKNRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than BCSAX (1.12). SKNRX (54.00) and BCSAX (53.00) have comparable annual turnover. SKNRX initial investment is less costly to investors than BCSAX (5%) vs BCSAX (5%). BCSAX (1000) and SKNRX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BCSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.21 vs. SKNRX (6.36). BCSAX return over 5 years is better than : 77.04 vs. SKNRX (63.62).
| BCSAX | SKNRX | BCSAX / SKNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.16 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.38 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.559 | 6.631 | 189% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 646M | 892M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.03 | 3.24 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 6.36 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.33 | -2.04 | -899% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.04 | 63.62 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.57 | 25.56 | 276% |