Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCSCX vs PCRPX
BCSCX vs PCRPX Comparison
Open Charts BCSCX vs PCRPX
BCSCX vs PCRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCSCX vs. PCRPX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCSCX is a Hold and PCRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCRPX has more cash in the bank: 4.72B vs. BCSCX (1.44B). BCSCX pays higher dividends than PCRPX: BCSCX (13.55) vs PCRPX (10.95). BCSCX was incepted earlier than PCRPX: BCSCX (15 years) vs PCRPX (18 years). BCSCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than PCRPX (1.26). PCRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 224.00 vs. BCSCX (88.00). BCSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCRPX: BCSCX (1000) vs PCRPX (1000000). PCRPX (39.19) and BCSCX (37.39) have marching annual gain over last year. BCSCX return over 5 years is better than : 80.21 vs. PCRPX (64.83).
| BCSCX | PCRPX | BCSCX / PCRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.13 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.26 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.707 | 32.777 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 4.72B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 13.55 | 10.95 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.39 | 39.19 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.36 | 51.25 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.21 | 64.83 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.48 | 127.65 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement