Advertisement
BCSF vs KTH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCSF is a Hold and KTH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BCSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKTH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BCSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- KTH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BCSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KTH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BCSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KTH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BCSF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.99% price change this week, while KTH (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.52%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +4.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
BCSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+0.96% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Financial Conglomerates (+4.62% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| BCSF | KTH | BCSF / KTH | |
| Capitalization | 976M | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.065 | -1.341 | 676% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.19 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 132M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 10.2M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.45B | N/A | - |
BCSF | KTH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BCSF's Valuation (6) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as KTH (18) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew similarly to KTH’s over the last 12 months.
BCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is significantly better than the same rating for KTH (100) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than KTH’s over the last 12 months.
BCSF's SMR Rating (37) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KTH (100) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KTH’s over the last 12 months.
KTH's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as BCSF (59) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that KTH’s stock grew similarly to BCSF’s over the last 12 months.
BCSF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is significantly better than the same rating for KTH (100) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than KTH’s over the last 12 months.
| BCSF | KTH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 25% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 17% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 21% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 14% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 14% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 22 days ago 13% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 9% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 44% | 5 days ago 8% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 19% |
Advertisement
BCSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCSF has been closely correlated with GBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCSF jumps, then GBDC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCSF | 100% | -1.38% | ||
| GBDC - BCSF | 80% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| OBDC - BCSF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| FDUS - BCSF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| TSLX - BCSF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| GSBD - BCSF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||
KTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KTH and TURN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTH and TURN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTH | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| TURN - KTH | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| EICA - KTH | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| HNNA - KTH | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| TRIN - KTH | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| BCSF - KTH | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||