BCSF
Price
$12.37
Change
+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
802.42M
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NMFC
Price
$7.16
Change
-$0.15 (-2.05%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
676.28M
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCSF vs NMFC

BCSF vs NMFC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCSF vs. NMFC commentary
Jun 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCSF is a Hold and NMFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2026
Stock price -- (BCSF: $12.36 vs. NMFC: $7.31)
Brand notoriety: BCSF and NMFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCSF: 107% vs. NMFC: 171%
Market capitalization -- BCSF: $802.42M vs. NMFC: $676.28M
BCSF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $802.42M. NMFC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $676.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNMFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NMFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCSF is a better buy in the long-term than NMFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NMFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCSF is a better buy in the short-term than NMFC.

Price Growth

BCSF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.19% price change this week, while NMFC (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCSF is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

NMFC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCSF($802M) has a higher market cap than NMFC($676M). NMFC has higher P/E ratio than BCSF: NMFC (53.50) vs BCSF (10.85). BCSF YTD gains are higher at: -4.914 vs. NMFC (-14.477). NMFC has less debt than BCSF: NMFC (1.33B) vs BCSF (1.46B). BCSF has higher revenues than NMFC: BCSF (88.7M) vs NMFC (-64.32M).
BCSFNMFCBCSF / NMFC
Capitalization802M676M119%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.914-14.47734%
P/E Ratio10.8553.5020%
Revenue88.7M-64.32M-138%
Total Cash16.6MN/A-
Total Debt1.46B1.33B110%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCSF vs NMFC: Fundamental Ratings
BCSF
NMFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8769
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
7292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5871
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
312
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5035

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCSF's Valuation (5) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as NMFC (9) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

BCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMFC (100) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

BCSF's SMR Rating (72) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as NMFC (92) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

BCSF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as NMFC (71) in the null industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

NMFC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BCSF (31) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that NMFC’s stock grew similarly to BCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSFNMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEXUX22.770.02
+0.09%
Baron Emerging Markets R6
PACLX36.40-0.31
-0.84%
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Adv
MGBRX17.87-0.18
-1.00%
MFS Global Total Return R2
ADCCX16.19-0.25
-1.52%
American Century Disciplined Growth C
LSAGX22.42-0.42
-1.84%
Loomis Sayles Global Growth A

BCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCSF has been closely correlated with OCSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCSF jumps, then OCSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCSF
1D Price
Change %
BCSF100%
-0.88%
OCSL - BCSF
68%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
ARCC - BCSF
67%
Closely correlated
-2.79%
PFLT - BCSF
67%
Closely correlated
-3.44%
GBDC - BCSF
66%
Closely correlated
-3.29%
NMFC - BCSF
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.18%
More

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
-3.18%
ARCC - NMFC
70%
Closely correlated
-2.79%
OCSL - NMFC
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
BCSF - NMFC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
BXSL - NMFC
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
NCDL - NMFC
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
More