BCUCY
Price
$11.89
Change
-$0.22 (-1.82%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.76B
CEBTF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.04 (-66.67%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
658.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCUCY vs CEBTF

Header iconBCUCY vs CEBTF Comparison
Open Charts BCUCY vs CEBTFBanner chart's image
Brunello Cucinelli S.P.A
Price$11.89
Change-$0.22 (-1.82%)
Volume$3.76K
Capitalization5.76B
Citychamp Watch & Jewellery Group
Price$0.02
Change-$0.04 (-66.67%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization658.59M
BCUCY vs CEBTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCUCY vs. CEBTF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCUCY is a Hold and CEBTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BCUCY: $11.92 vs. CEBTF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: BCUCY and CEBTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCUCY: 26% vs. CEBTF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BCUCY: $5.76B vs. CEBTF: $658.59M
BCUCY [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $5.76B. CEBTF’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $658.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $466.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $55.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCUCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCEBTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCUCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CEBTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCY is a better buy in the long-term than CEBTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCUCY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BCUCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BCUCY (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -2.85% price change this week, while CEBTF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCUCY is expected to report earnings on Apr 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+2.44% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCUCY($5.76B) has a higher market cap than CEBTF($659M). BCUCY YTD gains are higher at: 9.304 vs. CEBTF (-69.849). BCUCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 270M vs. CEBTF (111M). CEBTF has higher revenues than BCUCY: CEBTF (2.04B) vs BCUCY (920M).
BCUCYCEBTFBCUCY / CEBTF
Capitalization5.76B659M875%
EBITDA270M111M243%
Gain YTD9.304-69.849-13%
P/E Ratio64.94N/A-
Revenue920M2.04B45%
Total CashN/A7B-
Total DebtN/A1.25B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCUCY vs CEBTF: Fundamental Ratings
BCUCY
CEBTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5626
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17100
SMR RATING
1..100
4590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5090
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3985
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
22n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCUCY's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CEBTF (92). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew similarly to CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CEBTF (100). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew significantly faster than CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEBTF (90). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEBTF (90). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEBTF (85). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCUCYCEBTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBNAX31.550.10
+0.32%
NYLI Balanced Class A
ICPUX6.340.01
+0.16%
Integrity Mid-North American Resources C
FSANX16.91N/A
N/A
Fidelity Asset Manager 60%
MFWLX17.60N/A
N/A
MFS Global Total Return R6
NZDCHF0.48N/A
N/A
New Zealand Dollar - Switzerland Franc

BCUCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCUCY has been loosely correlated with LVMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCUCY jumps, then LVMHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCUCY
1D Price
Change %
BCUCY100%
-1.57%
LVMHF - BCUCY
46%
Loosely correlated
+4.39%
LVMUY - BCUCY
45%
Loosely correlated
+5.39%
HESAF - BCUCY
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
HESAY - BCUCY
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
PPRUY - BCUCY
42%
Loosely correlated
+6.04%
More

CEBTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEBTF and BCUCY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEBTF and BCUCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEBTF
1D Price
Change %
CEBTF100%
N/A
BCUCY - CEBTF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
CFRHF - CEBTF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
CFRUY - CEBTF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
BURBY - CEBTF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
DCOHF - CEBTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More