BCUCY
Price
$11.27
Change
+$0.17 (+1.53%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.56B
CEBTF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.04 (-66.67%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
164.57M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCUCY vs CEBTF

Header iconBCUCY vs CEBTF Comparison
Open Charts BCUCY vs CEBTFBanner chart's image
Brunello Cucinelli S P A
Price$11.27
Change+$0.17 (+1.53%)
Volume$205.39K
Capitalization7.56B
Citychamp Watch & Jewellery Group
Price$0.02
Change-$0.04 (-66.67%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization164.57M
BCUCY vs CEBTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCUCY vs. CEBTF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCUCY is a Hold and CEBTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BCUCY: $11.27 vs. CEBTF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: BCUCY and CEBTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCUCY: 29% vs. CEBTF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BCUCY: $7.56B vs. CEBTF: $164.57M
BCUCY [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $7.56B. CEBTF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $164.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $289.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $38.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCUCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCEBTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCUCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CEBTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCY is a better buy in the long-term than CEBTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCUCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BCUCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BCUCY (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а -2.00% price change this week, while CEBTF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+1.77% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCUCY($7.56B) has a higher market cap than CEBTF($165M). CEBTF has higher P/E ratio than BCUCY: CEBTF (62.68) vs BCUCY (49.85). BCUCY YTD gains are higher at: 3.343 vs. CEBTF (-69.849).
BCUCYCEBTFBCUCY / CEBTF
Capitalization7.56B165M4,582%
EBITDA362MN/A-
Gain YTD3.343-69.849-5%
P/E Ratio49.8562.6880%
Revenue1.28BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCUCY vs CEBTF: Fundamental Ratings
BCUCY
CEBTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8426
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21100
SMR RATING
1..100
4192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6089
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5483
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCUCY's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CEBTF (95). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew similarly to CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CEBTF (100). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew significantly faster than CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CEBTF (92). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CEBTF (89). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew similarly to CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CEBTF (83). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew similarly to CEBTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCUCYCEBTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLTY15.770.23
+1.45%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund
NCIQ30.550.38
+1.25%
Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF
LEAD74.620.19
+0.26%
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
QCLR31.770.05
+0.16%
Global X NASDAQ 100® Collar 95-110 ETF
IMCB82.44-0.05
-0.06%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

BCUCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCUCY has been loosely correlated with LVMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCUCY jumps, then LVMHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCUCY
1D Price
Change %
BCUCY100%
+1.53%
LVMHF - BCUCY
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
LVMUY - BCUCY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
HESAF - BCUCY
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
HESAY - BCUCY
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
PPRUY - BCUCY
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
More

CEBTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEBTF and BCUCY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEBTF and BCUCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEBTF
1D Price
Change %
CEBTF100%
N/A
BCUCY - CEBTF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
CFRHF - CEBTF
12%
Poorly correlated
+6.09%
CFRUY - CEBTF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
BURBY - CEBTF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
DCOHF - CEBTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More