BCUCY
Price
$12.46
Change
+$0.33 (+2.72%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
5.76B
LKFLF
Price
$2.40
Change
+$0.35 (+17.07%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCUCY vs LKFLF

Header iconBCUCY vs LKFLF Comparison
Open Charts BCUCY vs LKFLFBanner chart's image
Brunello Cucinelli S.P.A
Price$12.46
Change+$0.33 (+2.72%)
Volume$5.97K
Capitalization5.76B
Luk Fook Holdings International
Price$2.40
Change+$0.35 (+17.07%)
Volume$2.66K
Capitalization1.55B
BCUCY vs LKFLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCUCY vs. LKFLF commentary
Jun 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCUCY is a StrongBuy and LKFLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 02, 2025
Stock price -- (BCUCY: $12.46 vs. LKFLF: $2.40)
Brand notoriety: BCUCY and LKFLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCUCY: 43% vs. LKFLF: 26%
Market capitalization -- BCUCY: $5.76B vs. LKFLF: $1.55B
BCUCY [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $5.76B. LKFLF’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $1.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $466.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $55.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCUCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLKFLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCUCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LKFLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCUCY and LKFLF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCUCY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BCUCY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BCUCY (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +4.71% price change this week, while LKFLF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCUCY is expected to report earnings on Apr 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+1.29% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCUCY($5.76B) has a higher market cap than LKFLF($1.55B). BCUCY has higher P/E ratio than LKFLF: BCUCY (64.94) vs LKFLF (9.04). LKFLF YTD gains are higher at: 42.857 vs. BCUCY (15.202). LKFLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.83B vs. BCUCY (270M). LKFLF has higher revenues than BCUCY: LKFLF (8.86B) vs BCUCY (920M).
BCUCYLKFLFBCUCY / LKFLF
Capitalization5.76B1.55B373%
EBITDA270M1.83B15%
Gain YTD15.20242.85735%
P/E Ratio64.949.04718%
Revenue920M8.86B10%
Total CashN/A3.55B-
Total DebtN/A1.51B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCUCY vs LKFLF: Fundamental Ratings
BCUCY
LKFLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1483
SMR RATING
1..100
8869
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3526
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKFLF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCUCY (88). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew significantly faster than BCUCY’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LKFLF (83). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew significantly faster than LKFLF’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as BCUCY (88). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to BCUCY’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BCUCY (43). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to BCUCY’s over the last 12 months.

LKFLF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as BCUCY (35). This means that LKFLF’s stock grew similarly to BCUCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCUCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIBOX29.230.07
+0.24%
Thornburg Investment Income Builder R6
UGTIX27.600.01
+0.04%
Victory Growth and Tax Strategy Ins
FSTBX20.88N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Global Allocation A
CIVHX19.07N/A
N/A
American Funds International Vntg 529-F3
STRGX56.58-0.07
-0.12%
Sterling Capital MdCp Relatv Val Instl

BCUCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCUCY has been loosely correlated with LVMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCUCY jumps, then LVMHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCUCY
1D Price
Change %
BCUCY100%
+2.72%
LVMHF - BCUCY
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
LVMUY - BCUCY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
HESAF - BCUCY
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
HESAY - BCUCY
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
PPRUY - BCUCY
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More

LKFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKFLF and CJEWY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKFLF and CJEWY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKFLF
1D Price
Change %
LKFLF100%
N/A
CJEWY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHDRF - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
BCUCY - LKFLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
SWGAY - LKFLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
BBRYF - LKFLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
More