BCUCY
Price
$12.01
Change
-$0.03 (-0.25%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.76B
LVMHF
Price
$542.00
Change
-$7.00 (-1.28%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
466.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCUCY vs LVMHF

Header iconBCUCY vs LVMHF Comparison
Open Charts BCUCY vs LVMHFBanner chart's image
Brunello Cucinelli S.P.A
Price$12.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
Volume$3.96K
Capitalization5.76B
LVMH-Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton
Price$542.00
Change-$7.00 (-1.28%)
Volume$3.35K
Capitalization466.87B
BCUCY vs LVMHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCUCY vs. LVMHF commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCUCY is a Hold and LVMHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BCUCY: $12.01 vs. LVMHF: $542.00)
Brand notoriety: BCUCY and LVMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCUCY: 28% vs. LVMHF: 88%
Market capitalization -- BCUCY: $5.76B vs. LVMHF: $466.87B
BCUCY [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $5.76B. LVMHF’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $466.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $466.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $55.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCUCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVMHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCUCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LVMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCY is a better buy in the long-term than LVMHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCUCY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVMHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCUCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LVMHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCUCY is a better buy in the short-term than LVMHF.

Price Growth

BCUCY (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while LVMHF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCUCY is expected to report earnings on Apr 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+3.05% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVMHF($467B) has a higher market cap than BCUCY($5.76B). BCUCY has higher P/E ratio than LVMHF: BCUCY (64.94) vs LVMHF (25.97). BCUCY YTD gains are higher at: 11.042 vs. LVMHF (-17.466). LVMHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29.8B vs. BCUCY (270M). LVMHF has higher revenues than BCUCY: LVMHF (84.7B) vs BCUCY (920M).
BCUCYLVMHFBCUCY / LVMHF
Capitalization5.76B467B1%
EBITDA270M29.8B1%
Gain YTD11.042-17.466-63%
P/E Ratio64.9425.97250%
Revenue920M84.7B1%
Total CashN/A10.4B-
Total DebtN/A38.2B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCUCY vs LVMHF: Fundamental Ratings
BCUCY
LVMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7553
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1568
SMR RATING
1..100
88100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4881
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3977
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LVMHF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCUCY (89). This means that LVMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCUCY’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVMHF (68). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (100). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVMHF (81). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCUCY's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVMHF (77). This means that BCUCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCUCYLVMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USERX18.090.16
+0.89%
US Global Investors Gld & Prec Mtls
IASMX16.40N/A
N/A
Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus
MNBRX19.76N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
SELCX43.81N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Growth F (SIMT)
JLCYX69.07N/A
N/A
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R2

BCUCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCUCY has been loosely correlated with LVMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCUCY jumps, then LVMHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCUCY
1D Price
Change %
BCUCY100%
-0.25%
LVMHF - BCUCY
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
LVMUY - BCUCY
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
HESAF - BCUCY
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
HESAY - BCUCY
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
PPRUY - BCUCY
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More

LVMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVMHF has been closely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVMHF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVMHF
1D Price
Change %
LVMHF100%
-1.28%
LVMUY - LVMHF
98%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
HESAY - LVMHF
81%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
CFRUY - LVMHF
77%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
HESAF - LVMHF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.31%
PPRUY - LVMHF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
More