Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BCVCX vs RMFCX
BCVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BCVCX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Behav Lg Cp Val Eq C
Price$33.21
Change-$0.05 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.77M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
BCVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCVCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. BCVCX (47.8M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BCVCX: RMFCX (1.20) vs BCVCX (0.46). BCVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BCVCX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BCVCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BCVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCVCX: RMFCX (250) vs BCVCX (1000). BCVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.81 vs. RMFCX (8.11). BCVCX return over 5 years is better than : 106.75 vs. RMFCX (59.28).
| BCVCX | RMFCX | BCVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.91 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.91 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.501 | 14.779 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.8M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.20 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.81 | 8.11 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.03 | 43.61 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.75 | 59.28 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.82 | 93.90 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement