BCVVF
Price
$9.29
Change
+$0.28 (+3.11%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
6.16B
BDIMF
Price
$10.39
Change
-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
656.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCVVF vs BDIMF

Header iconBCVVF vs BDIMF Comparison
Open Charts BCVVF vs BDIMFBanner chart's image
BOC Aviation
Price$9.29
Change+$0.28 (+3.11%)
Volume$522
Capitalization6.16B
Black Diamond Group
Price$10.39
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization656.15M
BCVVF vs BDIMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BDIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCVVF vs. BDIMF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCVVF is a Buy and BDIMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BCVVF: $9.14 vs. BDIMF: $10.39)
Brand notoriety: BCVVF and BDIMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCVVF: 76% vs. BDIMF: 12%
Market capitalization -- BCVVF: $6.16B vs. BDIMF: $656.15M
BCVVF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.16B. BDIMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $656.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $59.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCVVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBDIMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCVVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BDIMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCVVF is a better buy in the long-term than BDIMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCVVF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BDIMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCVVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • BDIMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDIMF is a better buy in the short-term than BCVVF.

Price Growth

BCVVF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BDIMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +15.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.48% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCVVF($6.16B) has a higher market cap than BDIMF($656M). BDIMF has higher P/E ratio than BCVVF: BDIMF (28.18) vs BCVVF (8.00). BDIMF YTD gains are higher at: 58.839 vs. BCVVF (19.038). BCVVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.45B vs. BDIMF (113M). BCVVF has more cash in the bank: 81.3M vs. BDIMF (8.58M). BDIMF has less debt than BCVVF: BDIMF (267M) vs BCVVF (16.9B). BCVVF has higher revenues than BDIMF: BCVVF (2.24B) vs BDIMF (442M).
BCVVFBDIMFBCVVF / BDIMF
Capitalization6.16B656M938%
EBITDA1.45B113M1,281%
Gain YTD19.03858.83932%
P/E Ratio8.0028.1828%
Revenue2.24B442M508%
Total Cash81.3M8.58M947%
Total Debt16.9B267M6,330%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCVVF vs BDIMF: Fundamental Ratings
BCVVF
BDIMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4792
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
614
SMR RATING
1..100
6069
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCVVF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDIMF (93). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDIMF’s over the last 12 months.

BDIMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCVVF (61). This means that BDIMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCVVF’s over the last 12 months.

BCVVF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as BDIMF (69). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to BDIMF’s over the last 12 months.

BDIMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BCVVF (48). This means that BDIMF’s stock grew similarly to BCVVF’s over the last 12 months.

BCVVF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as BDIMF (18). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to BDIMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCVVFBDIMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BDIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGWCX37.56N/A
N/A
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
WLCVX23.25N/A
N/A
Wilshire Large Company Value Instl
SVPSX86.21N/A
N/A
ProFunds Small Cap Value Svc
PFGRX36.52N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Fundamental Growth R
TIHBX14.53N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Stock I

BCVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCVVF and FDCHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCVVF and FDCHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCVVF
1D Price
Change %
BCVVF100%
N/A
FDCHF - BCVVF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSASF - BCVVF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDIMF - BCVVF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
ASHTY - BCVVF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
BRRAY - BCVVF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BDIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDIMF and R have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDIMF and R's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDIMF
1D Price
Change %
BDIMF100%
-0.19%
R - BDIMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
AXP - BDIMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
ASHTY - BDIMF
18%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
ASHTF - BDIMF
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
BRRAY - BDIMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More