BCVVF
Price
$9.29
Change
+$0.28 (+3.11%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
6.12B
CSASF
Price
$19.89
Change
+$4.09 (+25.89%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.78B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCVVF vs CSASF

Header iconBCVVF vs CSASF Comparison
Open Charts BCVVF vs CSASFBanner chart's image
BOC Aviation
Price$9.29
Change+$0.28 (+3.11%)
Volume$522
Capitalization6.12B
Credit Saison
Price$19.89
Change+$4.09 (+25.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.78B
BCVVF vs CSASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCVVF vs. CSASF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCVVF is a Buy and CSASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BCVVF: $9.28 vs. CSASF: $19.89)
Brand notoriety: BCVVF and CSASF are both not notable
BCVVF represents the Finance/Rental/Leasing, while CSASF is part of the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCVVF: 66% vs. CSASF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BCVVF: $6.12B vs. CSASF: $3.78B
BCVVF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.12B. CSASF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $3.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $61.46B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $679.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.75B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCVVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSASF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCVVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSASF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCVVF is a better buy in the long-term than CSASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCVVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BCVVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

BCVVF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +3.17% price change this week, while CSASF (@Savings Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +4.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +4.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+4.04% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

@Savings Banks (+4.30% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCVVF($6.12B) has a higher market cap than CSASF($3.78B). BCVVF has higher P/E ratio than CSASF: BCVVF (8.00) vs CSASF (6.55). BCVVF YTD gains are higher at: 23.116 vs. CSASF (0.000). CSASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 145B vs. BCVVF (1.37B). CSASF has more cash in the bank: 99.4B vs. BCVVF (254M). BCVVF has less debt than CSASF: BCVVF (16.6B) vs CSASF (3.25T). CSASF has higher revenues than BCVVF: CSASF (438B) vs BCVVF (2.2B).
BCVVFCSASFBCVVF / CSASF
Capitalization6.12B3.78B162%
EBITDA1.37B145B1%
Gain YTD23.1160.000-
P/E Ratio8.006.55122%
Revenue2.2B438B1%
Total Cash254M99.4B0%
Total Debt16.6B3.25T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCVVF vs CSASF: Fundamental Ratings
BCVVF
CSASF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4841
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
461
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4271
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSASF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as BCVVF (24). This means that CSASF’s stock grew similarly to BCVVF’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCVVF (46). This means that CSASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCVVF’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BCVVF (100). This means that CSASF’s stock grew similarly to BCVVF’s over the last 12 months.

BCVVF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CSASF (71). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to CSASF’s over the last 12 months.

BCVVF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CSASF (100). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to CSASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCVVFCSASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VFINX599.16N/A
N/A
Vanguard 500 Index Investor
LAMTX25.27N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R5
BIGIX30.78N/A
N/A
William Blair International Growth I
NBMVX50.18N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Adv
HADUX76.49N/A
N/A
Horizon Equity Premium Income Advisor

BCVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCVVF and FDCHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCVVF and FDCHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCVVF
1D Price
Change %
BCVVF100%
N/A
FDCHF - BCVVF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSASF - BCVVF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDIMF - BCVVF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASHTY - BCVVF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
BRRAY - BCVVF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CSASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSASF has been loosely correlated with FDCHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSASF jumps, then FDCHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSASF
1D Price
Change %
CSASF100%
N/A
FDCHF - CSASF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ELEEF - CSASF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
PMTS - CSASF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
BCVVF - CSASF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASHTY - CSASF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More