BCVVF
Price
$9.00
Change
+$0.35 (+4.05%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
5.8B
FDCHF
Price
$1.53
Change
-$0.04 (-2.55%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
225.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCVVF vs FDCHF

Header iconBCVVF vs FDCHF Comparison
Open Charts BCVVF vs FDCHFBanner chart's image
BOC Aviation
Price$9.00
Change+$0.35 (+4.05%)
Volume$1.06K
Capitalization5.8B
Funding Circle
Price$1.53
Change-$0.04 (-2.55%)
Volume$23.08K
Capitalization225.69M
BCVVF vs FDCHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FDCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCVVF vs. FDCHF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCVVF is a Buy and FDCHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BCVVF: $9.00 vs. FDCHF: $1.53)
Brand notoriety: BCVVF and FDCHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCVVF: 163% vs. FDCHF: 101%
Market capitalization -- BCVVF: $5.8B vs. FDCHF: $225.69M
BCVVF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.8B. FDCHF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $225.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCVVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFDCHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCVVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FDCHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCVVF is a better buy in the long-term than FDCHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCVVF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FDCHF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCVVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • FDCHF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCVVF is a better buy in the short-term than FDCHF.

Price Growth

BCVVF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +10.43% price change this week, while FDCHF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.11% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCVVF($5.8B) has a higher market cap than FDCHF($226M). BCVVF has higher P/E ratio than FDCHF: BCVVF (270.27) vs FDCHF (6.84). BCVVF YTD gains are higher at: 19.337 vs. FDCHF (-2.548). BCVVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.54B vs. FDCHF (43.8M). FDCHF has more cash in the bank: 183M vs. BCVVF (85.2M). FDCHF has less debt than BCVVF: FDCHF (114M) vs BCVVF (15.1B). BCVVF has higher revenues than FDCHF: BCVVF (2.14B) vs FDCHF (172M).
BCVVFFDCHFBCVVF / FDCHF
Capitalization5.8B226M2,568%
EBITDA1.54B43.8M3,509%
Gain YTD19.337-2.548-759%
P/E Ratio270.276.843,949%
Revenue2.14B172M1,247%
Total Cash85.2M183M47%
Total Debt15.1B114M13,246%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCVVF vs FDCHF: Fundamental Ratings
BCVVF
FDCHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4749
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5070
SMR RATING
1..100
5360
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
661
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCVVF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDCHF (94). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDCHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCVVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCHF (70). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to FDCHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCVVF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCHF (60). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to FDCHF’s over the last 12 months.

BCVVF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCHF (50). This means that BCVVF’s stock grew similarly to FDCHF’s over the last 12 months.

FDCHF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCVVF (66). This means that FDCHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCVVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCVVFFDCHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FDCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMVLX77.21N/A
N/A
Smead Value Investor
WFAIX40.43N/A
N/A
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Admin
PMARX12.74N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Equ Premium Income A
RISAX28.22N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Rainier Intl Discv S
RUBCHF0.01N/A
N/A
Russia Ruble - Switzerland Franc

BCVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCVVF and FDCHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCVVF and FDCHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCVVF
1D Price
Change %
BCVVF100%
+4.05%
FDCHF - BCVVF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSASF - BCVVF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDIMF - BCVVF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.03%
ASHTY - BCVVF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
BRRAY - BCVVF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FDCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCHF has been loosely correlated with CSASF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDCHF jumps, then CSASF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDCHF
1D Price
Change %
FDCHF100%
N/A
CSASF - FDCHF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BCVVF - FDCHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.05%
LZRFY - FDCHF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
FNMA - FDCHF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
KGTHY - FDCHF
1%
Poorly correlated
+14.59%
More