Ad is loading...
BDAFX vs GFACX
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$29.49
Change+$0.25 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets482.57M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.28
Change+$0.60 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.75B
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. GFACX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. BDAFX (483M). BDAFX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAFX (0.00) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAFX (7 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. BDAFX (1.93). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: GFACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.25 vs. GFACX (20.31). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 122.09 vs. GFACX (43.12).
| BDAFX | GFACX | BDAFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.541 | 5.521 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 483M | 310B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.25 | 20.31 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.46 | 13.25 | 419% |
| Returns for 5 years | 122.09 | 43.12 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.91 | - |