Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs GFACX
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$29.59
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.38M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$69.20
Change+$0.71 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.68B
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 314B vs. BDAFX (478M). BDAFX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAFX (0.01) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAFX (7 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAFX (1.04). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (4.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: GFACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.90 vs. GFACX (7.84). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 128.21 vs. GFACX (43.09).
| BDAFX | GFACX | BDAFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.36 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.780 | 8.532 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 478M | 314B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.90 | 7.84 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.35 | 45.29 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 128.21 | 43.09 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement