Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs GFACX
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$31.63
Change+$0.25 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets508.67M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.35
Change+$0.38 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. GFACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. BDAFX (509M). BDAFX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAFX (0.01) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAFX (8 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAFX (1.04). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (4.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: GFACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.34 vs. GFACX (4.83). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 110.14 vs. GFACX (25.13).
| BDAFX | GFACX | BDAFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.36 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.008 | 15.041 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 509M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.34 | 4.83 | 276% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.72 | 55.67 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.14 | 25.13 | 438% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement