Ad is loading...
BDAFX vs GFACX
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$25.30
Change+$0.54 (+2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.26M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. BDAFX (446M). BDAFX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAFX (0.01) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAFX (7 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAFX (1.04). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (1.93). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: GFACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.21 vs. GFACX (-7.10). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 110.76 vs. GFACX (37.34).
| BDAFX | GFACX | BDAFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.36 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.323 | -9.959 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 446M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.21 | -7.10 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.93 | 2.19 | 1,870% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.76 | 37.34 | 297% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...