Ad is loading...
BDAFX vs GFACX
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$27.64
Change-$0.60 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets512.89M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$63.16
Change-$1.29 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.54B
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. GFACX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 299B vs. BDAFX (513M). BDAFX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAFX (0.00) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAFX (7 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. BDAFX (1.93). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: GFACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.76 vs. GFACX (3.95). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 115.81 vs. GFACX (35.30).
| BDAFX | GFACX | BDAFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -0.941 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513M | 299B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.76 | 3.95 | 374% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.47 | 14.82 | 408% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.81 | 35.30 | 328% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.10 | - |