Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs GFACX
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$28.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.38M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.41
Change-$0.22 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. BDAFX (478M). BDAFX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAFX (0.01) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAFX (7 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAFX (1.04). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (1.93). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: GFACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.72 vs. GFACX (6.51). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 116.25 vs. GFACX (34.58).
| BDAFX | GFACX | BDAFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.36 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.727 | 4.501 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 478M | 305B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.72 | 6.51 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.88 | 31.78 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.25 | 34.58 | 336% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement