Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs GFACX
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$31.72
Change+$0.09 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets539.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.34
Change+$0.45 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. GFACX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. BDAFX (540M). BDAFX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAFX (0.01) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAFX (8 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAFX (1.04). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (4.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: GFACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.55 vs. GFACX (13.55). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 111.96 vs. GFACX (28.67).
| BDAFX | GFACX | BDAFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.36 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.004 | 15.025 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 540M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.55 | 13.55 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.06 | 47.95 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.96 | 28.67 | 391% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.75 | - |