Ad is loading...
BDAFX vs GFACX
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$28.72
Change+$0.34 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.04
Change+$0.58 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
BDAFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. GFACX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 301B vs. BDAFX (487M). BDAFX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAFX (0.00) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAFX (7 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. BDAFX (1.93). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: GFACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.38 vs. GFACX (18.45). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 122.36 vs. GFACX (39.36).
| BDAFX | GFACX | BDAFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.030 | 18.255 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 487M | 301B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.38 | 18.45 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.42 | -1.66 | -2,490% |
| Returns for 5 years | 122.36 | 39.36 | 311% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.22 | - |