Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs RGACX
BDAFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs RGACX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$32.06
Change-$0.16 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets529.23M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.45
Change-$0.56 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
BDAFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. BDAFX (529M). RGACX pays higher dividends than BDAFX: RGACX (0.07) vs BDAFX (0.01). BDAFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BDAFX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BDAFX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (4.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: RGACX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.88 vs. RGACX (14.51). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 118.36 vs. RGACX (40.62).
| BDAFX | RGACX | BDAFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.94 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.94 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.534 | 18.697 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 529M | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.07 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.88 | 14.51 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 115.92 | 72.98 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.36 | 40.62 | 291% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement