Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAFX vs RGAHX
BDAFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BDAFX vs RGAHX
Baron Durable Advantage Retail
Price$32.06
Change-$0.16 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets529.23M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.52
Change-$0.56 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
BDAFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAFX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. BDAFX (529M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BDAFX: RGAHX (0.45) vs BDAFX (0.01). BDAFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BDAFX (8 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BDAFX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAFX (4.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAFX: RGAHX (250) vs BDAFX (2000). BDAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.88 vs. RGAHX (15.26). BDAFX return over 5 years is better than : 118.36 vs. RGAHX (43.58).
| BDAFX | RGAHX | BDAFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.44 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.44 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.534 | 19.172 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 529M | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.45 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.88 | 15.26 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 115.92 | 75.27 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.36 | 43.58 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement