Ad is loading...
BDAIX vs GFACX
BDAIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAIX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Institutional
Price$26.23
Change+$2.58 (+10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.26M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$58.83
Change+$5.60 (+10.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
BDAIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAIX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAIX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. BDAIX (446M). BDAIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAIX (0.25) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAIX (7 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAIX (0.77). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAIX (1.93). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAIX: GFACX (250) vs BDAIX (1000000). BDAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.57 vs. GFACX (-13.80). BDAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.75 vs. GFACX (27.34).
| BDAIX | GFACX | BDAIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.365 | -16.515 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 446M | 246B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.57 | -13.80 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.23 | -7.38 | -396% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.75 | 27.34 | 368% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...