Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAIX vs GFACX
BDAIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAIX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage Institutional
Price$29.67
Change+$0.28 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.38M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.05
Change+$0.64 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
BDAIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAIX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAIX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. BDAIX (478M). BDAIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAIX (0.23) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAIX (7 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAIX (0.77). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAIX (1.93). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAIX: GFACX (250) vs BDAIX (1000000). BDAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. GFACX (7.19). BDAIX return over 5 years is better than : 118.63 vs. GFACX (35.43).
| BDAIX | GFACX | BDAIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.690 | 5.160 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 478M | 305B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 7.19 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.26 | 31.50 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.63 | 35.43 | 335% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement