Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAUX vs GFACX
BDAUX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAUX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage R6
Price$31.09
Change+$0.32 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.38M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.62
Change+$0.69 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.78B
BDAUX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAUX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAUX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 320B vs. BDAUX (478M). BDAUX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAUX (0.21) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAUX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAUX (8 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAUX (0.74). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAUX (4.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAUX: GFACX (250) vs BDAUX (5000000). BDAUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. GFACX (8.68). BDAUX return over 5 years is better than : 127.89 vs. GFACX (39.40).
| BDAUX | GFACX | BDAUX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.36 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.475 | 10.759 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 478M | 320B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.45 | 8.68 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.50 | 52.72 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 127.89 | 39.40 | 325% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement