Ad is loading...
BDAUX vs GFACX
BDAUX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAUX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage R6
Price$25.45
Change-$1.58 (-5.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets487.34M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
BDAUX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAUX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAUX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. BDAUX (487M). BDAUX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAUX (0.25) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAUX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAUX (7 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAUX (0.74). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAUX (1.93). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAUX: GFACX (250) vs BDAUX (5000000). BDAUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. GFACX (-1.75). BDAUX return over 5 years is better than : 154.67 vs. GFACX (59.73).
| BDAUX | GFACX | BDAUX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.36 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.357 | -5.003 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 487M | 280B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.30 | -1.75 | -474% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.69 | 0.63 | 7,078% |
| Returns for 5 years | 154.67 | 59.73 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...