Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAUX vs GFACX
BDAUX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAUX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage R6
Price$31.88
Change-$0.37 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets516.14M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.97
Change-$0.51 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
BDAUX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAUX vs. GFACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAUX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. BDAUX (516M). BDAUX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAUX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAUX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAUX (8 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAUX (0.74). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAUX (4.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAUX: GFACX (250) vs BDAUX (5000000). BDAUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. GFACX (5.07). BDAUX return over 5 years is better than : 109.97 vs. GFACX (24.08).
| BDAUX | GFACX | BDAUX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.36 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.359 | 14.445 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 516M | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.30 | 5.07 | 263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.66 | 54.86 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.97 | 24.08 | 457% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers