Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDAUX vs GFACX
BDAUX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BDAUX vs GFACX
Baron Durable Advantage R6
Price$32.09
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets510.56M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.00
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
BDAUX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDAUX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDAUX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. BDAUX (511M). BDAUX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BDAUX (0.21) vs GFACX (0.00). BDAUX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BDAUX (8 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BDAUX (0.74). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BDAUX (4.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDAUX: GFACX (250) vs BDAUX (5000000). BDAUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.44 vs. GFACX (14.24). BDAUX return over 5 years is better than : 127.10 vs. GFACX (36.56).
| BDAUX | GFACX | BDAUX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.36 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.841 | 12.829 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 511M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.44 | 14.24 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.58 | 42.51 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 127.10 | 36.56 | 348% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement