Ad is loading...
BDBPX vs FSSNX
BDBPX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts BDBPX vs FSSNX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx Inv P
Price$20.91
Change-$1.48 (-6.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.6B
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$23.80
Change-$1.68 (-6.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
BDBPX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDBPX vs. FSSNX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDBPX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. BDBPX (2.6B). BDBPX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: BDBPX (1.78) vs FSSNX (1.13). BDBPX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: BDBPX (7 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). BDBPX (0.38) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). BDBPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDBPX: FSSNX (0) vs BDBPX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.02 vs. BDBPX (-2.57). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 103.11 vs. BDBPX (83.02).
| BDBPX | FSSNX | BDBPX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.03 | 1,480% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.03 | 1,520% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.012 | -7.948 | 101% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.6B | 24.2B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.13 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.57 | -0.02 | 15,860% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.96 | 2.50 | -119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.02 | 103.11 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...