Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BDFIX vs NRGSX
BDFIX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts BDFIX vs NRGSX
Baron Discovery Institutional
Price$34.55
Change+$0.30 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
BDFIX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BDFIX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDFIX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. BDFIX (1.79B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than BDFIX: NRGSX (0.07) vs BDFIX (0.00). BDFIX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: BDFIX (12 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). BDFIX (1.05) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). BDFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BDFIX: NRGSX (0) vs BDFIX (1000000). BDFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). BDFIX return over 5 years is better than : 7.61 vs. NRGSX (-11.01).
| BDFIX | NRGSX | BDFIX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.74 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.74 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.088 | -7.590 | -80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 8.19B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.28 | -14.62 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.12 | -4.10 | -1,102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.61 | -11.01 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 206.41 | 3.70 | 5,584% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement