BDGSF
Price
$104.44
Change
+$5.50 (+5.56%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.51B
JFWV
Price
$102.65
Change
-$7.35 (-6.68%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
26.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDGSF vs JFWV

Header iconBDGSF vs JFWV Comparison
Open Charts BDGSF vs JFWVBanner chart's image
Bank of Ga Group
Price$104.44
Change+$5.50 (+5.56%)
Volume$101
Capitalization4.51B
JSB Financial
Price$102.65
Change-$7.35 (-6.68%)
Volume$100
Capitalization26.43M
BDGSF vs JFWV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BDGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JFWV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDGSF vs. JFWV commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDGSF is a Hold and JFWV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BDGSF: $104.44 vs. JFWV: $102.65)
Brand notoriety: BDGSF and JFWV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDGSF: 36% vs. JFWV: 42%
Market capitalization -- BDGSF: $4.51B vs. JFWV: $26.43M
BDGSF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.51B. JFWV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $26.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDGSF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileJFWV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BDGSF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • JFWV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BDGSF is a better buy in the long-term than JFWV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDGSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JFWV’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDGSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • JFWV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BDGSF and JFWV are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BDGSF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JFWV (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.65% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDGSF($4.51B) has a higher market cap than JFWV($26.4M). JFWV (6.44) and BDGSF (6.17) have similar P/E ratio . BDGSF YTD gains are higher at: 72.457 vs. JFWV (19.324). JFWV has less debt than BDGSF: JFWV (3.27M) vs BDGSF (6.66B). BDGSF has higher revenues than JFWV: BDGSF (4.03B) vs JFWV (16M).
BDGSFJFWVBDGSF / JFWV
Capitalization4.51B26.4M17,076%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD72.45719.324375%
P/E Ratio6.176.4496%
Revenue4.03B16M25,194%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt6.66B3.27M203,361%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDGSF vs JFWV: Fundamental Ratings
BDGSF
JFWV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4896
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
347
SMR RATING
1..100
952
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
973
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4955

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BDGSF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JFWV (97). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew significantly faster than JFWV’s over the last 12 months.

BDGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JFWV (47). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JFWV’s over the last 12 months.

BDGSF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JFWV (52). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JFWV’s over the last 12 months.

BDGSF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as JFWV (58). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew similarly to JFWV’s over the last 12 months.

BDGSF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JFWV (73). This means that BDGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JFWV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDGSFJFWV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JFWV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEGIX22.16N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Equity Income Instl
IVVIX20.12N/A
N/A
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund Class I
EIPFX19.05N/A
N/A
EIP Growth and Income Investor
RIRGX78.27-0.45
-0.57%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R6
BARAX90.60-0.55
-0.60%
Baron Asset Retail

BDGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDGSF has been loosely correlated with BKQNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDGSF jumps, then BKQNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDGSF
1D Price
Change %
BDGSF100%
N/A
BKQNF - BDGSF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JFWV - BDGSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOGN - BDGSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%
MCHT - BDGSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOBS - BDGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More

JFWV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JFWV and BDGSF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JFWV and BDGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFWV
1D Price
Change %
JFWV100%
N/A
BDGSF - JFWV
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZBC - JFWV
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNTN - JFWV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBSI - JFWV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFBC - JFWV
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
More