BDL
Price
$31.01
Change
+$2.63 (+9.27%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
57.64M
DMPZF
Price
$2.80
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.08B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDL vs DMPZF

Header iconBDL vs DMPZF Comparison
Open Charts BDL vs DMPZFBanner chart's image
Flanigan's Enterprises
Price$31.01
Change+$2.63 (+9.27%)
Volume$521
Capitalization57.64M
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$2.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization1.08B
BDL vs DMPZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDL vs. DMPZF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDL is a Hold and DMPZF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BDL: $31.01 vs. DMPZF: $2.80)
Brand notoriety: BDL and DMPZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDL: 46% vs. DMPZF: 156%
Market capitalization -- BDL: $57.64M vs. DMPZF: $1.08B
BDL [@Restaurants] is valued at $57.64M. DMPZF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $226.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDMPZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BDL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DMPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BDL is a better buy in the long-term than DMPZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DMPZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DMPZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DMPZF is a better buy in the short-term than BDL.

Price Growth

BDL (@Restaurants) experienced а +5.12% price change this week, while DMPZF (@Restaurants) price change was +1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.55% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DMPZF($1.08B) has a higher market cap than BDL($57.6M). BDL has higher P/E ratio than DMPZF: BDL (13.31) vs DMPZF (10.57). BDL YTD gains are higher at: 24.914 vs. DMPZF (-27.083). DMPZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 163M vs. BDL (15.7M). BDL has more cash in the bank: 18.9M vs. DMPZF (14.4M). BDL has less debt than DMPZF: BDL (47.7M) vs DMPZF (230M). DMPZF has higher revenues than BDL: DMPZF (669M) vs BDL (202M).
BDLDMPZFBDL / DMPZF
Capitalization57.6M1.08B5%
EBITDA15.7M163M10%
Gain YTD24.914-27.083-92%
P/E Ratio13.3110.57126%
Revenue202M669M30%
Total Cash18.9M14.4M131%
Total Debt47.7M230M21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDL vs DMPZF: Fundamental Ratings
BDL
DMPZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6395
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43100
SMR RATING
1..100
7911
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5987
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6986
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMPZF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BDL (26) in the Restaurants industry. This means that DMPZF’s stock grew similarly to BDL’s over the last 12 months.

BDL's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMPZF (100) in the null industry. This means that BDL’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BDL (79) in the Restaurants industry. This means that DMPZF’s stock grew significantly faster than BDL’s over the last 12 months.

BDL's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DMPZF (87) in the null industry. This means that BDL’s stock grew similarly to DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

BDL's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DMPZF (86) in the null industry. This means that BDL’s stock grew similarly to DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDLDMPZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBGAX61.84N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Genesis Adv
GGEAX24.45N/A
N/A
Nationwide Global Sust Eq A
RYCPX85.96N/A
N/A
Rydex Consumer Products C
TINVX24.79N/A
N/A
Thornburg International Growth R4
DWGCX12.60-0.04
-0.32%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc C

DMPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMPZF and BDL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMPZF and BDL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMPZF
1D Price
Change %
DMPZF100%
N/A
BDL - DMPZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.27%
DPUKY - DMPZF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGY - DMPZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
CMPGF - DMPZF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
KRUS - DMPZF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
More