BDL
Price
$26.40
Change
-$0.60 (-2.22%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
49.07M
FAT
Price
$2.22
Change
-$0.14 (-5.93%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
40.07M
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDL vs FAT

Header iconBDL vs FAT Comparison
Open Charts BDL vs FATBanner chart's image
Flanigan's Enterprises
Price$26.40
Change-$0.60 (-2.22%)
Volume$1.54K
Capitalization49.07M
FAT Brands
Price$2.22
Change-$0.14 (-5.93%)
Volume$137.8K
Capitalization40.07M
BDL vs FAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDL vs. FAT commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDL is a Hold and FAT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BDL: $26.40 vs. FAT: $2.22)
Brand notoriety: BDL and FAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDL: 42% vs. FAT: 377%
Market capitalization -- BDL: $49.07M vs. FAT: $40.07M
BDL [@Restaurants] is valued at $49.07M. FAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $40.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BDL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BDL is a better buy in the long-term than FAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BDL (@Restaurants) experienced а +12.92% price change this week, while FAT (@Restaurants) price change was -12.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

BDL is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

FAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.93% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDL($49.1M) has a higher market cap than FAT($40.1M). BDL YTD gains are higher at: 4.554 vs. FAT (-25.102). BDL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.7M vs. FAT (-12.82M). BDL has more cash in the bank: 27.3M vs. FAT (23.4M). BDL has less debt than FAT: BDL (49.3M) vs FAT (1.48B). FAT has higher revenues than BDL: FAT (593M) vs BDL (193M).
BDLFATBDL / FAT
Capitalization49.1M40.1M122%
EBITDA13.7M-12.82M-107%
Gain YTD4.554-25.102-18%
P/E Ratio12.05N/A-
Revenue193M593M33%
Total Cash27.3M23.4M117%
Total Debt49.3M1.48B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDL vs FAT: Fundamental Ratings
BDL
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4955
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4964
SMR RATING
1..100
81100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4786
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAT's Valuation (2) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BDL (19). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to BDL’s over the last 12 months.

BDL's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FAT (64). This means that BDL’s stock grew similarly to FAT’s over the last 12 months.

BDL's SMR Rating (81) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FAT (100). This means that BDL’s stock grew similarly to FAT’s over the last 12 months.

BDL's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAT (86). This means that BDL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

BDL's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FAT (100). This means that BDL’s stock grew similarly to FAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNIEX11.220.03
+0.27%
UBS International Sustainable Equity A
UUPIX57.41-0.08
-0.14%
ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Inv
LAFRX18.85-0.04
-0.21%
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
RPPRX29.16-0.08
-0.27%
Victory RS Partners R6
GTMRX17.59-0.08
-0.45%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth R

BDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDL and DMPZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDL and DMPZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDL
1D Price
Change %
BDL100%
-2.22%
DMPZF - BDL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FAT - BDL
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.93%
FWRG - BDL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
GTIM - BDL
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
CNNE - BDL
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FAT and GENK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FAT and GENK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
-5.93%
GENK - FAT
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.88%
WEN - FAT
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
BROS - FAT
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.61%
DENN - FAT
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.38%
CAVA - FAT
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More