BDRFF
Price
$125.86
Change
-$5.84 (-4.43%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
DQWS
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.02 (-50.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

BDRFF vs DQWS

Header iconBDRFF vs DQWS Comparison
Open Charts BDRFF vs DQWSBanner chart's image
Beiersdorf AG
Price$125.86
Change-$5.84 (-4.43%)
Volume$124
CapitalizationN/A
Dswiss
Price$0.02
Change-$0.02 (-50.00%)
Volume$10.03K
CapitalizationN/A
BDRFF vs DQWS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BDRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDRFF vs. DQWS commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDRFF is a Hold and DQWS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BDRFF: $125.86 vs. DQWS: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: BDRFF and DQWS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDRFF: 5% vs. DQWS: 141%
Market capitalization -- BDRFF: $29.45B vs. DQWS: $20.69M
BDRFF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $29.45B. DQWS’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $20.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $24.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDRFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDQWS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BDRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DQWS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DQWS is a better buy in the long-term than BDRFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDRFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DQWS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDRFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • DQWS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDRFF is a better buy in the short-term than DQWS.

Price Growth

BDRFF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.89% price change this week, while DQWS (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -50.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-3.48% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDRFF($29.5B) has a higher market cap than DQWS($20.7M). DQWS has higher P/E ratio than BDRFF: DQWS (100.00) vs BDRFF (34.97). BDRFF YTD gains are higher at: -15.011 vs. DQWS (-39.000). BDRFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.4B vs. DQWS (25.4K). BDRFF has more cash in the bank: 2B vs. DQWS (155K). DQWS has less debt than BDRFF: DQWS (84.4K) vs BDRFF (241M). BDRFF has higher revenues than DQWS: BDRFF (8.8B) vs DQWS (1.67M).
BDRFFDQWSBDRFF / DQWS
Capitalization29.5B20.7M142,512%
EBITDA1.4B25.4K5,507,874%
Gain YTD-15.011-39.00038%
P/E Ratio34.97100.0035%
Revenue8.8B1.67M527,834%
Total Cash2B155K1,289,032%
Total Debt241M84.4K285,545%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDRFF vs DQWS: Fundamental Ratings
BDRFF
DQWS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9397
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68100
SMR RATING
1..100
5420
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
704
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BDRFF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as DQWS (86). This means that BDRFF’s stock grew similarly to DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

BDRFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as DQWS (100). This means that BDRFF’s stock grew similarly to DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDRFF (54). This means that DQWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDRFF’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDRFF (74). This means that DQWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDRFF’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BDRFF (70). This means that DQWS’s stock grew significantly faster than BDRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDRFFDQWS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BDRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITM46.07-0.28
-0.60%
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
JOJO14.73-0.15
-1.04%
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
HYIN17.89-0.40
-2.19%
WisdomTree Alternative Income Fund
EELV23.74-0.54
-2.22%
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Vol ETF
BKSE101.40-4.19
-3.97%
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF

BDRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDRFF and HENKY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDRFF and HENKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDRFF
1D Price
Change %
BDRFF100%
-4.43%
HENKY - BDRFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
BDRFY - BDRFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
ETTYF - BDRFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEGIY - BDRFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
DQWS - BDRFF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-50.00%
More

DQWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DQWS and BICEY have been poorly correlated (+-1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DQWS and BICEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DQWS
1D Price
Change %
DQWS100%
-50.00%
BICEY - DQWS
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
ETTYF - DQWS
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDRFF - DQWS
-1%
Poorly correlated
-4.43%
HEGIY - DQWS
-3%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
BICEF - DQWS
-5%
Poorly correlated
-5.93%
More