BDULF
Price
$0.72
Change
-$0.13 (-15.29%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
13.33B
NUMIF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
44.18M
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BDULF vs NUMIF

Header iconBDULF vs NUMIF Comparison
Open Charts BDULF vs NUMIFBanner chart's image
Bangkok Dusit Medical Services Public
Price$0.72
Change-$0.13 (-15.29%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization13.33B
Numinus Wellness
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$602.07K
Capitalization44.18M
BDULF vs NUMIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NUMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDULF vs. NUMIF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDULF is a Hold and NUMIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BDULF: $0.72 vs. NUMIF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: BDULF and NUMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDULF: 143% vs. NUMIF: 283%
Market capitalization -- BDULF: $13.33B vs. NUMIF: $44.18M
BDULF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $13.33B. NUMIF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $44.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDULF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNUMIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BDULF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NUMIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BDULF and NUMIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NUMIF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NUMIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BDULF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -15.40% price change this week, while NUMIF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +3.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

NUMIF is expected to report earnings on Apr 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+4.05% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDULF($13.3B) has a higher market cap than NUMIF($44.2M). NUMIF YTD gains are higher at: 27.600 vs. BDULF (-15.398). BDULF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.9B vs. NUMIF (-41.92M). BDULF has more cash in the bank: 17.8B vs. NUMIF (13M). NUMIF has less debt than BDULF: NUMIF (7.65M) vs BDULF (22.2B). BDULF has higher revenues than NUMIF: BDULF (93B) vs NUMIF (21.2M).
BDULFNUMIFBDULF / NUMIF
Capitalization13.3B44.2M30,090%
EBITDA22.9B-41.92M-54,631%
Gain YTD-15.39827.600-56%
P/E Ratio36.23N/A-
Revenue93B21.2M438,679%
Total Cash17.8B13M136,923%
Total Debt22.2B7.65M290,348%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDULF: Fundamental Ratings
BDULF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDULFNUMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NUMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TYGO0.970.13
+15.36%
Tigo Energy
UPWK16.890.52
+3.18%
Upwork
ALTI4.090.08
+2.00%
AlTi Global
CI283.993.02
+1.07%
Cigna Group (The)
RLI77.63-0.20
-0.26%
RLI Corp

BDULF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDULF and MD have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDULF and MD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDULF
1D Price
Change %
BDULF100%
N/A
MD - BDULF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
PIII - BDULF
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.81%
NUMIF - BDULF
7%
Poorly correlated
+14.75%
RHE - BDULF
6%
Poorly correlated
+13.37%
INNV - BDULF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
More

NUMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NUMIF and PHCI have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NUMIF and PHCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NUMIF
1D Price
Change %
NUMIF100%
+14.75%
PHCI - NUMIF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIII - NUMIF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.81%
DCGO - NUMIF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
BDULF - NUMIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIRS - NUMIF
6%
Poorly correlated
+8.11%
More