BDVB
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.06M
DPZUF
Price
$10.27
Change
-$1.72 (-14.35%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
916.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDVB vs DPZUF

Header iconBDVB vs DPZUF Comparison
Open Charts BDVB vs DPZUFBanner chart's image
Bagger Dave's Burger Tavern
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization1.06M
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$10.27
Change-$1.72 (-14.35%)
Volume$524
Capitalization916.51M
BDVB vs DPZUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BDVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDVB vs. DPZUF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDVB is a StrongBuy and DPZUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BDVB: $0.04 vs. DPZUF: $10.27)
Brand notoriety: BDVB and DPZUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDVB: 6% vs. DPZUF: 114%
Market capitalization -- BDVB: $1.06M vs. DPZUF: $916.51M
BDVB [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.06M. DPZUF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $916.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $222.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDVB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDPZUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BDVB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BDVB and DPZUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDVB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPZUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDVB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BDVB is a better buy in the short-term than DPZUF.

Price Growth

BDVB (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DPZUF (@Restaurants) price change was -14.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.05% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPZUF($917M) has a higher market cap than BDVB($1.06M). BDVB YTD gains are higher at: -36.893 vs. DPZUF (-44.185).
BDVBDPZUFBDVB / DPZUF
Capitalization1.06M917M0%
EBITDAN/A195M-
Gain YTD-36.893-44.18583%
P/E RatioN/A133.33-
RevenueN/A2.26B-
Total CashN/A87.7M-
Total DebtN/A1.46B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDVB vs DPZUF: Fundamental Ratings
BDVB
DPZUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3131
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4165
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
673
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZUF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDVB (57). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDVB’s over the last 12 months.

BDVB's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (100). This means that BDVB’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BDVB's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZUF (91). This means that BDVB’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

BDVB's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (65). This means that BDVB’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BDVB (67). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BDVB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDVBDPZUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
80%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTOGX16.550.03
+0.18%
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth R6
PNSIX19.50N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
JEMOX37.35N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R5
RMBLX53.65N/A
N/A
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
USRAX33.39N/A
N/A
Horizon Multi-Factor U.S. Equity Inv

BDVB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDVB and CMPGF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDVB and CMPGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDVB
1D Price
Change %
BDVB100%
N/A
CMPGF - BDVB
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
KRUS - BDVB
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
DPZUF - BDVB
3%
Poorly correlated
-14.35%
DMZPY - BDVB
-0%
Poorly correlated
-11.09%
CMPGY - BDVB
-5%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and RAVE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and RAVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
-14.35%
RAVE - DPZUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
BDVB - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
DMZPY - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-11.09%
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
More