BDWBF
Price
$1.05
Change
-$0.03 (-2.78%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
32.1B
HKHHF
Price
$69.72
Change
+$0.41 (+0.59%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
23.41B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDWBF vs HKHHF

Header iconBDWBF vs HKHHF Comparison
Open Charts BDWBF vs HKHHFBanner chart's image
BUDWEISER BREWING CO APAC
Price$1.05
Change-$0.03 (-2.78%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization32.1B
Heineken Holding
Price$69.72
Change+$0.41 (+0.59%)
Volume$6.98K
Capitalization23.41B
BDWBF vs HKHHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BDWBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HKHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDWBF vs. HKHHF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDWBF is a Hold and HKHHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BDWBF: $1.05 vs. HKHHF: $69.72)
Brand notoriety: BDWBF and HKHHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDWBF: 24% vs. HKHHF: 219%
Market capitalization -- BDWBF: $32.1B vs. HKHHF: $23.41B
BDWBF [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $32.1B. HKHHF’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $23.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $21.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDWBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHKHHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BDWBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HKHHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BDWBF is a better buy in the long-term than HKHHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDWBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HKHHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BDWBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HKHHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BDWBF and HKHHF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BDWBF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -14.85% price change this week, while HKHHF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was -0.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+0.27% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDWBF($32.1B) has a higher market cap than HKHHF($23.4B). BDWBF has higher P/E ratio than HKHHF: BDWBF (34.60) vs HKHHF (16.37). BDWBF YTD gains are higher at: 20.911 vs. HKHHF (17.580). HKHHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.54B vs. BDWBF (1.98B). HKHHF has more cash in the bank: 2.77B vs. BDWBF (1.93B). BDWBF has less debt than HKHHF: BDWBF (224M) vs HKHHF (16.4B). HKHHF has higher revenues than BDWBF: HKHHF (28.7B) vs BDWBF (6.48B).
BDWBFHKHHFBDWBF / HKHHF
Capitalization32.1B23.4B137%
EBITDA1.98B6.54B30%
Gain YTD20.91117.580119%
P/E Ratio34.6016.37211%
Revenue6.48B28.7B23%
Total Cash1.93B2.77B70%
Total Debt224M16.4B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKHHF: Fundamental Ratings
HKHHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDWBFHKHHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDWBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HKHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGCL0.560.04
+7.93%
Lucas GC Limited
JRVR5.820.23
+4.11%
James River Group Holdings Ltd
IVZ21.10-0.07
-0.33%
Invesco Ltd
BELFB131.10-0.61
-0.46%
Bel Fuse
ANGH3.41-0.15
-4.20%
Anghami Inc

BDWBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDWBF and TSGTF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDWBF and TSGTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDWBF
1D Price
Change %
BDWBF100%
N/A
TSGTF - BDWBF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
BDWBY - BDWBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.63%
TSRYY - BDWBF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
HKHHF - BDWBF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
ABEV - BDWBF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
More

HKHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKHHF has been loosely correlated with HEINY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKHHF jumps, then HEINY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKHHF
1D Price
Change %
HKHHF100%
+0.60%
HEINY - HKHHF
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
HKHHY - HKHHF
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
HINKF - HKHHF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
PDRDF - HKHHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
BUD - HKHHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
More