BDWBY
Price
$4.27
Change
+$0.03 (+0.71%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
32.1B
CATWF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.04 (+133.33%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
38.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BDWBY vs CATWF

Header iconBDWBY vs CATWF Comparison
Open Charts BDWBY vs CATWFBanner chart's image
BUDWEISER BREWING CO APAC
Price$4.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.71%)
Volume$1.42K
Capitalization32.1B
China Tontine Wines Group
Price$0.07
Change+$0.04 (+133.33%)
Volume$200
Capitalization38.25M
BDWBY vs CATWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BDWBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BDWBY vs. CATWF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDWBY is a Hold and CATWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BDWBY: $4.27 vs. CATWF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: BDWBY and CATWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDWBY: 41% vs. CATWF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BDWBY: $32.1B vs. CATWF: $38.25M
BDWBY [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $32.1B. CATWF’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $38.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $21.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDWBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCATWF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BDWBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CATWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BDWBY is a better buy in the long-term than CATWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BDWBY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BDWBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BDWBY (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а +0.71% price change this week, while CATWF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (-1.85% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BDWBY($32.1B) has a higher market cap than CATWF($38.2M). BDWBY YTD gains are higher at: 12.879 vs. CATWF (0.000). BDWBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.98B vs. CATWF (-17.25M). BDWBY has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. CATWF (5.73M). CATWF has less debt than BDWBY: CATWF (484K) vs BDWBY (224M). BDWBY has higher revenues than CATWF: BDWBY (6.48B) vs CATWF (15.6M).
BDWBYCATWFBDWBY / CATWF
Capitalization32.1B38.2M84,031%
EBITDA1.98B-17.25M-11,475%
Gain YTD12.8790.000-
P/E Ratio34.48N/A-
Revenue6.48B15.6M41,526%
Total Cash1.93B5.73M33,723%
Total Debt224M484K46,281%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CATWF: Fundamental Ratings
CATWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
29
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BDWBYCATWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BDWBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALBKY0.860.01
+0.81%
Alpha Services and Holdings SA
ASBFF27.88N/A
N/A
Associated British Foods plc
AVNI0.28N/A
N/A
Arvana, Inc.
KMBIF14.33N/A
N/A
Kambi Group LTD.
MGHL1.21N/A
N/A
Morgan Group Holding Co.

BDWBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDWBY has been loosely correlated with CRHKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDWBY jumps, then CRHKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDWBY
1D Price
Change %
BDWBY100%
N/A
CRHKY - BDWBY
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
TSGTY - BDWBY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CABGY - BDWBY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
PRNDY - BDWBY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
TSGTF - BDWBY
26%
Poorly correlated
-11.15%
More

CATWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CATWF has been loosely correlated with STBFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CATWF jumps, then STBFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CATWF
1D Price
Change %
CATWF100%
N/A
STBFF - CATWF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BDWBY - CATWF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDVGF - CATWF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
AUVGF - CATWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROYUF - CATWF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More