BDWBY vs CATWF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDWBY is a Hold and CATWF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BDWBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCATWF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BDWBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CATWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BDWBY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BDWBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BDWBY (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -8.85% price change this week, while CATWF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.32%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Alcoholic (-1.15% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| BDWBY | CATWF | BDWBY / CATWF | |
| Capitalization | 32.1B | 38.2M | 84,031% |
| EBITDA | 1.98B | -17.25M | -11,475% |
| Gain YTD | -12.281 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 34.48 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.48B | 15.6M | 41,526% |
| Total Cash | 1.93B | 5.73M | 33,723% |
| Total Debt | 224M | 484K | 46,281% |
CATWF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BDWBY | CATWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 18% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 14% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 77% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
BDWBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BDWBY has been loosely correlated with CRHKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BDWBY jumps, then CRHKY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BDWBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDWBY | 100% | -3.18% | ||
| CRHKY - BDWBY | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| TSGTY - BDWBY | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.44% | ||
| CABGY - BDWBY | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.38% | ||
| PRNDY - BDWBY | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.94% | ||
| TSGTF - BDWBY | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CATWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CATWF has been loosely correlated with STBFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CATWF jumps, then STBFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CATWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| STBFF - CATWF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BDWBY - CATWF | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.18% | ||
| EDVGF - CATWF | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.48% | ||
| AUVGF - CATWF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ROYUF - CATWF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||