BEAT vs CDNS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEAT is a Hold and CDNS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BEAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BEAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CDNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BEAT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDNS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BEAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- CDNS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BEAT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while CDNS (@Packaged Software) price change was +8.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
BEAT is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
CDNS is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.57% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| BEAT | CDNS | BEAT / CDNS | |
| Capitalization | 57.1M | 85.1B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -15.31M | 1.46B | -1% |
| Gain YTD | -6.522 | 8.008 | -81% |
| P/E Ratio | 149.25 | 81.70 | 183% |
| Revenue | 0 | 4.09B | - |
| Total Cash | 16.2M | 1.14B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 5.42M | 764M | 1% |
BEAT | CDNS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 15 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BEAT's Valuation (83) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CDNS (84) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that BEAT’s stock grew similarly to CDNS’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for BEAT (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew significantly faster than BEAT’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's SMR Rating (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEAT (99) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEAT’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEAT (62) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEAT’s over the last 12 months.
BEAT's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNS (45) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that BEAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNS’s over the last 12 months.
| BEAT | CDNS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 76% | 16 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 16 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% | 22 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 50% |
BEAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BEAT and DSGX have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEAT and DSGX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BEAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEAT | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| DSGX - BEAT | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| LIQQF - BEAT | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PDFS - BEAT | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
| LYT - BEAT | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CDNS - BEAT | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.94% | ||
More | ||||
CDNS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| SNPS - CDNS | 87% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| ANSS - CDNS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| PDFS - CDNS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| MSFT - CDNS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| ADSK - CDNS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||