| BEDZ | ITB | BEDZ / ITB | |
| Gain YTD | -5.813 | -3.800 | 153% |
| Net Assets | 2.73M | 2.51B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.38 | 261% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 13.00 | 1,054% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 1.55 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| BEDZ | ITB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BEDZ and NCLH have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEDZ and NCLH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BEDZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEDZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| NCLH - BEDZ | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
| RCL - BEDZ | 13% Poorly correlated | -3.23% | ||
| CNTY - BEDZ | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.65% | ||
| MAR - BEDZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| TH - BEDZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +3.36% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITB has been closely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ITB jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.