Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEDZ vs IYC
BEDZ vs IYC Comparison
Open Charts BEDZ vs IYC
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
Price$31.50
Change+$0.16 (+0.51%)
Volume$359
Net Assets2.66M
iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF
Price$98.29
Change-$0.46 (-0.47%)
Volume$1.2K
Net Assets1.52B
BEDZ vs IYC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEDZ vs. IYC commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEDZ is a Hold and IYC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYC has more net assets: 1.52B vs. BEDZ (2.66M). IYC has a higher annual dividend yield than BEDZ: IYC (3.165) vs BEDZ (-4.442). BEDZ was incepted earlier than IYC: BEDZ (5 years) vs IYC (25 years). IYC (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than BEDZ (0.99). BEDZ has a higher turnover IYC (22.00) vs IYC (22.00).
| BEDZ | IYC | BEDZ / IYC | |
| Gain YTD | -4.442 | 3.165 | -140% |
| Net Assets | 2.66M | 1.52B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.38 | 261% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 22.00 | 623% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BEDZ | IYC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BEDZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BEDZ and HLT have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEDZ and HLT's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BEDZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEDZ | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| HLT - BEDZ | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
| H - BEDZ | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| NCLH - BEDZ | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
| CCL - BEDZ | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.58% | ||
| MCRI - BEDZ | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||
IYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYC has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYC jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y