Ad is loading...
BEGRX vs TEDSX
BEGRX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts BEGRX vs TEDSX
Franklin Mutual Beacon Z
Price$16.81
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.15B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$30.11
Change+$0.13 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.91B
BEGRX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEGRX vs. TEDSX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEGRX is a Buy and TEDSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 8.91B vs. BEGRX (3.15B). BEGRX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: BEGRX (1.90) vs TEDSX (0.94). BEGRX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: BEGRX (63 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than BEGRX (0.77). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. BEGRX (15.03). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEGRX: TEDSX (1000) vs BEGRX (100000). BEGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.35 vs. TEDSX (-2.93). BEGRX (35.57) and TEDSX (35.19) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BEGRX | TEDSX | BEGRX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.96 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.96 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 63 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.191 | 7.268 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.15B | 8.91B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 0.94 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.35 | -2.93 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.17 | 5.17 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.57 | 35.19 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.01 | -8.52 | -47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers