BEKSF vs TKAMY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEKSF is a Buy and TKAMY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BEKSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTKAMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BEKSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TKAMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TKAMY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- TKAMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BEKSF (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TKAMY (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -3.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
TKAMY is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (-3.57% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| BEKSF | TKAMY | BEKSF / TKAMY | |
| Capitalization | 1.83B | 6.54B | 28% |
| EBITDA | 296M | 1.16B | 26% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 156.774 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 8.44 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.96B | 34.7B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 507M | 5.13B | 10% |
| Total Debt | 803M | 1.43B | 56% |
BEKSF | TKAMY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 32 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BEKSF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TKAMY (83). This means that BEKSF’s stock grew significantly faster than TKAMY’s over the last 12 months.
BEKSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as TKAMY (68). This means that BEKSF’s stock grew similarly to TKAMY’s over the last 12 months.
BEKSF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as TKAMY (93). This means that BEKSF’s stock grew similarly to TKAMY’s over the last 12 months.
TKAMY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEKSF (71). This means that TKAMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEKSF’s over the last 12 months.
TKAMY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEKSF (62). This means that TKAMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEKSF’s over the last 12 months.
| TKAMY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
BEKSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BEKSF has been loosely correlated with GFLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BEKSF jumps, then GFLT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BEKSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEKSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GFLT - BEKSF | 48% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TKAMY - BEKSF | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.19% | ||
| TYEKF - BEKSF | 4% Poorly correlated | -7.31% | ||
| MUEL - BEKSF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| LQMT - BEKSF | 3% Poorly correlated | +4.06% | ||
More | ||||
TKAMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TKAMY and TYEKF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TKAMY and TYEKF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TKAMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKAMY | 100% | -4.19% | ||
| TYEKF - TKAMY | 23% Poorly correlated | -7.31% | ||
| IIIN - TKAMY | 22% Poorly correlated | -6.53% | ||
| ESAB - TKAMY | 21% Poorly correlated | -8.37% | ||
| MLI - TKAMY | 21% Poorly correlated | -6.69% | ||
| TG - TKAMY | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.23% | ||
More | ||||