Ad is loading...
BELGF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
GUYGF
Price
$1.35
Change
-$0.04 (-2.88%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

BELGF vs GUYGF

Header iconBELGF vs GUYGF Comparison
Open Charts BELGF vs GUYGFBanner chart's image
Bellevue Gold
Price$1.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
G2 Goldfields
Price$1.35
Change-$0.04 (-2.88%)
Volume$12.84K
CapitalizationN/A
BELGF vs GUYGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BELGF vs. GUYGF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BELGF is a Hold and GUYGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BELGF: $1.00 vs. GUYGF: $1.35)
Brand notoriety: BELGF and GUYGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BELGF: 52% vs. GUYGF: 39%
Market capitalization -- BELGF: $1.13B vs. GUYGF: $109.84M
BELGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.13B. GUYGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $109.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BELGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGUYGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BELGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GUYGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BELGF and GUYGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BELGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GUYGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -12.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BELGF($1.13B) has a higher market cap than GUYGF($110M). GUYGF YTD gains are higher at: 142.959 vs. BELGF (-13.043). GUYGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.89M vs. BELGF (-20.87M). BELGF has more cash in the bank: 29.2M vs. GUYGF (6.02M). GUYGF has higher revenues than BELGF: GUYGF (322K) vs BELGF (1.32K).
BELGFGUYGFBELGF / GUYGF
Capitalization1.13B110M1,024%
EBITDA-20.87M-3.89M537%
Gain YTD-13.043142.959-9%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.32K322K0%
Total Cash29.2M6.02M485%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GUYGF: Fundamental Ratings
GUYGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEMYX11.26-0.05
-0.44%
Fidelity Series Sustainable Emerg Mkts
BIGIX29.40-0.19
-0.64%
William Blair International Growth I
TOCQX50.70-0.52
-1.02%
Tocqueville
SSAQX86.05-1.34
-1.53%
State Street US Core Equity Fund
AASOX18.00-0.48
-2.60%
Alger Small Cap Growth I-2

BELGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BELGF has been loosely correlated with CGDXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BELGF jumps, then CGDXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BELGF
1D Price
Change %
BELGF100%
N/A
CGDXF - BELGF
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.59%
ALKEF - BELGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNGXF - BELGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GUYGF - BELGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
FFMGF - BELGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.31%
More

GUYGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GUYGF and BTG have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GUYGF and BTG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GUYGF
1D Price
Change %
GUYGF100%
-2.67%
BTG - GUYGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
DOLLF - GUYGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
NFGC - GUYGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
SILV - GUYGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
OBNNF - GUYGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More