Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWBX
BEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWBX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$9.83
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets709.44M
American Funds New World R2
Price$82.91
Change+$0.31 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.33B
BEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 68.3B vs. BEMCX (709M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: BEMCX (1.85) vs RNWBX (0.13). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: BEMCX (12 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). BEMCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (27.76). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.00 vs. RNWBX (9.01). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.92 vs. RNWBX (30.21).
| BEMCX | RNWBX | BEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 1.67 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 1.67 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.952 | 12.726 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 709M | 68.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 0.13 | 1,371% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.00 | 9.01 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.77 | 29.09 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.92 | 30.21 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.39 | 55.94 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement