Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWHX
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$10.53
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets775.72M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$90.17
Change+$0.32 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. BEMCX (776M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMCX (1.91) vs RNWHX (1.00). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMCX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.96 vs. RNWHX (13.15). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.30 vs. RNWHX (22.76).
| BEMCX | RNWHX | BEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.72 | 288% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.72 | 288% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.595 | 18.614 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 776M | 71.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.00 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.96 | 13.15 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.06 | 38.85 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.30 | 22.76 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement