Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWHX
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$10.15
Change+$0.09 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets730.16M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.56
Change+$0.54 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.12B
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. BEMCX (730M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMCX (1.96) vs RNWHX (0.99). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMCX (12 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.33 vs. RNWHX (11.66). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.15 vs. RNWHX (32.51).
| BEMCX | RNWHX | BEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.72 | 289% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.72 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.365 | 16.496 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 730M | 70.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 0.99 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.33 | 11.66 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.20 | 40.00 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.15 | 32.51 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement