Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWHX
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$10.48
Change+$0.20 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets747.05M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.78
Change+$0.74 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.98B
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. BEMCX (747M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMCX (1.91) vs RNWHX (1.00). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMCX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.75 vs. RNWHX (18.70). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.09 vs. RNWHX (26.09).
| BEMCX | RNWHX | BEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.72 | 289% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.72 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.041 | 16.785 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 747M | 70B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.00 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.75 | 18.70 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.47 | 33.47 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.09 | 26.09 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement