Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
BEMCX vs RNWHX
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$8.47
Change-$0.05 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New World R5E
Price$79.89
Change-$0.18 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 61.7B vs. BEMCX (645M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than BEMCX: RNWHX (1.44) vs BEMCX (1.22). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMCX (12 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BEMCX (19.23). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.50 vs. BEMCX (9.16). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.73 vs. BEMCX (5.08).
| BEMCX | RNWHX | BEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.869 | 7.843 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 645M | 61.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.44 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.16 | 11.50 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.97 | -11.39 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.08 | 17.73 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.88 | N/A | - |