Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWHX
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$11.22
Change-$0.08 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets842.58M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.70
Change-$0.31 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. BEMCX (843M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMCX (1.93) vs RNWHX (0.93). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMCX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (21.13). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.61 vs. RNWHX (12.65). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 70.73 vs. RNWHX (30.19).
| BEMCX | RNWHX | BEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.72 | 288% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.72 | 288% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.029 | 24.572 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 843M | 75.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 0.93 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.61 | 12.65 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.74 | 57.51 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.73 | 30.19 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement