Ad is loading...
BEMCX vs RNWHX
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$8.48
Change+$0.13 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.04M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$74.96
Change+$0.47 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.57B
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 59.6B vs. BEMCX (610M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMCX (2.01) vs RNWHX (1.12). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMCX (12 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). BEMCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (27.76). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. RNWHX (-0.21). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.07 vs. RNWHX (32.05).
| BEMCX | RNWHX | BEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.72 | 289% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.72 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.566 | -2.013 | -78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 59.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.12 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | -0.21 | -2,558% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.53 | 3.82 | 563% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.07 | 32.05 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...