Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMCX vs RNWHX
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BEMCX vs RNWHX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
Price$9.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets683.43M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$83.07
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.63B
BEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 66.6B vs. BEMCX (683M). BEMCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BEMCX (1.96) vs RNWHX (1.10). BEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BEMCX (12 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BEMCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMCX (27.76). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs BEMCX (2500). BEMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.77 vs. RNWHX (4.17). BEMCX return over 5 years is better than : 62.60 vs. RNWHX (40.72).
| BEMCX | RNWHX | BEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.72 | 289% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.72 | 289% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.735 | 9.234 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 683M | 66.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 1.10 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.77 | 4.17 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.72 | 26.13 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.60 | 40.72 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers