Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEMIX vs RNWBX
BEMIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts BEMIX vs RNWBX
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
Price$11.44
Change-$0.08 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets842.58M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
BEMIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEMIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEMIX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. BEMIX (843M). BEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: BEMIX (2.48) vs RNWBX (0.12). BEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: BEMIX (15 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than BEMIX (1.11). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. BEMIX (21.13). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEMIX: RNWBX (250) vs BEMIX (100000). BEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.81 vs. RNWBX (11.48). BEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 78.20 vs. RNWBX (25.41).
| BEMIX | RNWBX | BEMIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.67 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.67 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.083 | 23.671 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 843M | 75.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 0.12 | 2,056% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.81 | 11.48 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.34 | 54.43 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.20 | 25.41 | 308% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.67 | 86.19 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement