BEPTF
Price
$0.87
Change
+$0.07 (+8.75%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.87B
CGXEF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
35.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BEPTF vs CGXEF

Header iconBEPTF vs CGXEF Comparison
Open Charts BEPTF vs CGXEFBanner chart's image
Beach Energy
Price$0.87
Change+$0.07 (+8.75%)
Volume$205
Capitalization1.87B
CGX Energy
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$1.73K
Capitalization35.69M
BEPTF vs CGXEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BEPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BEPTF vs. CGXEF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEPTF is a Buy and CGXEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BEPTF: $0.87 vs. CGXEF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: BEPTF and CGXEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BEPTF: 18% vs. CGXEF: 4%
Market capitalization -- BEPTF: $1.87B vs. CGXEF: $35.69M
BEPTF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.87B. CGXEF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $35.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $119.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BEPTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCGXEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BEPTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CGXEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGXEF is a better buy in the long-term than BEPTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BEPTF’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGXEF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BEPTF’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CGXEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BEPTF is a better buy in the short-term than CGXEF.

Price Growth

BEPTF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +8.48% price change this week, while CGXEF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.15% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BEPTF($1.87B) has a higher market cap than CGXEF($35.7M). CGXEF YTD gains are higher at: 12.203 vs. BEPTF (0.458). CGXEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.8M vs. BEPTF (-593.9M). BEPTF has more cash in the bank: 172M vs. CGXEF (1.35M). BEPTF has higher revenues than CGXEF: BEPTF (1.77B) vs CGXEF (189K).
BEPTFCGXEFBEPTF / CGXEF
Capitalization1.87B35.7M5,232%
EBITDA-593.9M-1.8M32,969%
Gain YTD0.45812.2034%
P/E Ratio28.05N/A-
Revenue1.77B189K934,392%
Total Cash172M1.35M12,703%
Total Debt795MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BEPTF vs CGXEF: Fundamental Ratings
BEPTF
CGXEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2885
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
601
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BEPTF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGXEF (99). This means that BEPTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGXEF’s over the last 12 months.

BEPTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CGXEF (100). This means that BEPTF’s stock grew similarly to CGXEF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXEF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as BEPTF (94). This means that CGXEF’s stock grew similarly to BEPTF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXEF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BEPTF (59). This means that CGXEF’s stock grew similarly to BEPTF’s over the last 12 months.

CGXEF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEPTF (60). This means that CGXEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEPTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BEPTFCGXEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BEPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIECX19.62N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV International Equity C
SMGIX39.58N/A
N/A
Columbia Contrarian Core Inst
GGYPX15.94N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Focused Value P
JSJFX16.93N/A
N/A
JHancock Small Cap Dynamic Growth R6
DDERX15.63-0.07
-0.45%
Macquarie Wealth Builder R6

BEPTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BEPTF and CTARF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEPTF and CTARF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BEPTF
1D Price
Change %
BEPTF100%
N/A
CTARF - BEPTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
WTXR - BEPTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNPRF - BEPTF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
CGXEF - BEPTF
7%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
CDDRF - BEPTF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More

CGXEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGXEF has been loosely correlated with FECCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGXEF jumps, then FECCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGXEF
1D Price
Change %
CGXEF100%
+6.01%
FECCF - CGXEF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
EWPMF - CGXEF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNNEF - CGXEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEPTF - CGXEF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNPRF - CGXEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
More