BFACF
Price
$11.14
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
NPAB
Price
$10.90
Change
-$0.40 (-3.54%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

BFACF vs NPAB

Header iconBFACF vs NPAB Comparison
Open Charts BFACF vs NPABBanner chart's image
Battery Future Acquisition
Price$11.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$2.24K
CapitalizationN/A
New Providence Acquisition
Price$10.90
Change-$0.40 (-3.54%)
Volume$1.14K
CapitalizationN/A
BFACF vs NPAB Comparison Chart
Loading...
BFACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFACF vs. NPAB commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFACF is a Buy and NPAB is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BFACF: $11.14 vs. NPAB: $10.90)
Brand notoriety: BFACF and NPAB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFACF: 36% vs. NPAB: 102%
Market capitalization -- BFACF: $151.75M vs. NPAB: $124.16M
BFACF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $151.75M. NPAB’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $124.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFACF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPAB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFACF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BFACF and NPAB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFACF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPAB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFACF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NPAB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BFACF is a better buy in the short-term than NPAB.

Price Growth

BFACF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while NPAB (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

NPAB is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.83% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFACF($152M) has a higher market cap than NPAB($124M). NPAB has higher P/E ratio than BFACF: NPAB (59.89) vs BFACF (45.83). BFACF YTD gains are higher at: 2.673 vs. NPAB (2.540). NPAB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.33M vs. BFACF (-3.43M). BFACF has more cash in the bank: 112K vs. NPAB (56.9K). BFACF (0) and NPAB (0) have equivalent revenues.
BFACFNPABBFACF / NPAB
Capitalization152M124M123%
EBITDA-3.43M-1.33M259%
Gain YTD2.6732.540105%
P/E Ratio45.8359.8977%
Revenue00-
Total Cash112K56.9K197%
Total DebtN/A290K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFACFNPAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
5%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
14%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
5%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
5%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BFACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSKD4.66-0.19
-3.92%
Riskified Ltd
DALN4.87-0.25
-4.88%
DallasNews Corp
AEVA3.83-0.22
-5.43%
Aeva Technologies
SGRY19.88-1.15
-5.47%
Surgery Partners
TLK15.45-0.92
-5.62%
PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia

BFACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFACF has been loosely correlated with MITAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFACF jumps, then MITAU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFACF
1D Price
Change %
BFACF100%
N/A
MITAU - BFACF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
GLLIU - BFACF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NPAB - BFACF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUET - BFACF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZAPP - BFACF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
More

NPAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPAB has been loosely correlated with WINVU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPAB jumps, then WINVU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPAB
1D Price
Change %
NPAB100%
N/A
WINVU - NPAB
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GBBK - NPAB
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WAVS - NPAB
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
NPABU - NPAB
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
INAQU - NPAB
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More