BFC
Price
$101.55
Change
+$1.12 (+1.12%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
29 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$32.50
Change
+$0.45 (+1.40%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BFC vs MCBS

Header iconBFC vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts BFC vs MCBSBanner chart's image
Bank First
Price$101.55
Change+$1.12 (+1.12%)
Volume$64.61K
CapitalizationN/A
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$32.50
Change+$0.45 (+1.40%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BFC vs MCBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFC vs. MCBS commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFC is a Hold and MCBS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BFC: $101.55 vs. MCBS: $32.44)
Brand notoriety: BFC and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFC: 354% vs. MCBS: 273%
Market capitalization -- BFC: $839.24M vs. MCBS: $629.13M
BFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $839.24M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $629.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BFC and MCBS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BFC is a better buy in the short-term than MCBS.

Price Growth

BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.91% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFC($839M) has a higher market cap than MCBS($629M). MCBS (11.86) and BFC (11.37) have similar P/E ratio . MCBS YTD gains are higher at: 39.217 vs. BFC (18.732). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. BFC (46.3M). BFC has less debt than MCBS: BFC (51.4M) vs MCBS (334M). BFC has higher revenues than MCBS: BFC (137M) vs MCBS (118M).
BFCMCBSBFC / MCBS
Capitalization839M629M133%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.73239.21748%
P/E Ratio11.3711.8696%
Revenue137M118M116%
Total Cash46.3M251M18%
Total Debt51.4M334M15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFC vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
BFC
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2619
SMR RATING
1..100
2325
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4129
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BFC's Valuation (96) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (97) in the null industry. This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as BFC (26) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (25) in the null industry. This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (44) in the null industry. This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as BFC (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFCMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LFMGX22.040.28
+1.29%
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth F
RYHOX73.340.61
+0.84%
Rydex NASDAQ-100® H
PJFAX60.320.34
+0.57%
PGIM Jennison Growth A
MDODX10.320.04
+0.39%
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity R6
PWITX16.14-0.02
-0.12%
PACE International Equity Invmt P2

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
+1.23%
FFBC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
BUSE - MCBS
85%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
UBSI - MCBS
85%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
FCBC - MCBS
84%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
TOWN - MCBS
84%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
More