BFC
Price
$133.33
Change
+$4.99 (+3.89%)
Updated
Oct 6, 02:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.23B
15 days until earnings call
RBCAA
Price
$72.45
Change
+$0.70 (+0.98%)
Updated
Oct 6, 01:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.38B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFC vs RBCAA

Header iconBFC vs RBCAA Comparison
Open Charts BFC vs RBCAABanner chart's image
Bank First
Price$133.33
Change+$4.99 (+3.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.23B
Republic Ban
Price$72.45
Change+$0.70 (+0.98%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.38B
BFC vs RBCAA Comparison Chart in %
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBCAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFC vs. RBCAA commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFC is a StrongBuy and RBCAA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BFC: $128.34 vs. RBCAA: $71.75)
Brand notoriety: BFC and RBCAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFC: 95% vs. RBCAA: 109%
Market capitalization -- BFC: $1.23B vs. RBCAA: $1.38B
BFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.23B. RBCAA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRBCAA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RBCAA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BFC is a better buy in the long-term than RBCAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBCAA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RBCAA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BFC is a better buy in the short-term than RBCAA.

Price Growth

BFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.19% price change this week, while RBCAA (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

RBCAA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBCAA($1.38B) has a higher market cap than BFC($1.23B). BFC has higher P/E ratio than RBCAA: BFC (17.95) vs RBCAA (11.12). BFC YTD gains are higher at: 35.099 vs. RBCAA (4.705). BFC has less debt than RBCAA: BFC (122M) vs RBCAA (405M). RBCAA has higher revenues than BFC: RBCAA (401M) vs BFC (162M).
BFCRBCAABFC / RBCAA
Capitalization1.23B1.38B89%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.0994.705746%
P/E Ratio17.9511.12161%
Revenue162M401M40%
Total Cash84.7MN/A-
Total Debt122M405M30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFC vs RBCAA: Fundamental Ratings
BFC
RBCAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5960
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1713
SMR RATING
1..100
3520
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1366
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BFC's Valuation (78) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RBCAA (81). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to RBCAA’s over the last 12 months.

RBCAA's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (17). This means that RBCAA’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

RBCAA's SMR Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BFC (35). This means that RBCAA’s stock grew similarly to BFC’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RBCAA (56). This means that BFC’s stock grew similarly to RBCAA’s over the last 12 months.

BFC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBCAA (66). This means that BFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBCAA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFCRBCAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBCAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRRGX34.330.09
+0.26%
Meridian Growth Institutional
TRPBX26.320.05
+0.19%
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Allc Inv
PMIYX11.24N/A
N/A
Putnam Multi-Asset Income Y
MXKWX10.64N/A
N/A
Empower S&P 500® Index Institutional
LIGNX12.17N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles International Growth N