Ad is loading...
BFGFX vs RPMGX
BFGFX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs RPMGX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$47.85
Change+$0.22 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.33
Change+$0.38 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.69B
BFGFX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.7B vs. BFGFX (2.11B). RPMGX pays higher dividends than BFGFX: RPMGX (0.05) vs BFGFX (0.00). BFGFX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: BFGFX (17 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. BFGFX (5.84). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: BFGFX (2000) vs RPMGX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.17 vs. RPMGX (3.12). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 124.02 vs. RPMGX (4.05).
| BFGFX | RPMGX | BFGFX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.356 | 2.607 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 30.7B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.17 | 3.12 | 1,126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.94 | -3.66 | -436% |
| Returns for 5 years | 124.02 | 4.05 | 3,065% |
| Returns for 10 years | 251.39 | 38.31 | 656% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers