Ad is loading...
BFGFX vs RPMGX
BFGFX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs RPMGX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$47.36
Change-$1.74 (-3.54%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$99.82
Change-$3.46 (-3.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
BFGFX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. RPMGX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.4B vs. BFGFX (1.95B). RPMGX pays higher dividends than BFGFX: RPMGX (0.05) vs BFGFX (0.00). BFGFX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: BFGFX (16 years) vs RPMGX (32 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. BFGFX (5.84). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: BFGFX (2000) vs RPMGX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.86 vs. RPMGX (4.60). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 146.12 vs. RPMGX (9.06).
| BFGFX | RPMGX | BFGFX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.705 | 3.239 | 1,072% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 31.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.86 | 4.60 | 780% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.24 | -8.96 | -192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 146.12 | 9.06 | 1,613% |
| Returns for 10 years | 246.84 | 37.01 | 667% |