Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs RPMGX
BFGFX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs RPMGX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$50.92
Change-$0.25 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.81B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.75
Change-$0.76 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.99B
BFGFX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. RPMGX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. BFGFX (2.81B). BFGFX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFGFX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: BFGFX (17 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). BFGFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. BFGFX (6.00). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: BFGFX (2000) vs RPMGX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.42 vs. RPMGX (-5.59). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.12 vs. RPMGX (-3.83).
| BFGFX | RPMGX | BFGFX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.75 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.75 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.867 | 3.028 | 260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 27B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.42 | -5.59 | -419% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.04 | 21.61 | 333% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.12 | -3.83 | -1,255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 293.57 | 29.42 | 998% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers