Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGFX vs RPMGX
BFGFX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGFX vs RPMGX
Baron Focused Growth Retail
Price$50.48
Change+$0.50 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$101.34
Change-$0.12 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.36B
BFGFX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGFX vs. RPMGX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGFX is a StrongBuy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. BFGFX (2.56B). BFGFX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . BFGFX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: BFGFX (17 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). BFGFX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. BFGFX (6.00). BFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: BFGFX (2000) vs RPMGX (2500). BFGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.65 vs. RPMGX (-0.10). BFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.48 vs. RPMGX (1.47).
| BFGFX | RPMGX | BFGFX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.75 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.75 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.867 | 1.735 | 338% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 27.4B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.65 | -0.10 | -38,236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.21 | 5.40 | 633% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.48 | 1.47 | 5,200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 246.46 | 24.39 | 1,010% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers