Advertisement
BFH vs TALO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFH is a Hold and TALO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTALO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BFH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TALO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TALO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- TALO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BFH (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while TALO (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -3.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.53%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
BFH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
TALO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-2.32% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
@Oil & Gas Production (-0.62% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| BFH | TALO | BFH / TALO | |
| Capitalization | 1.84B | 2.55B | 72% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 1.05B | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.159 | -11.946 | -10% |
| P/E Ratio | 2.44 | 8.98 | 27% |
| Revenue | 4.3B | 1.46B | 295% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 33.6M | - |
| Total Debt | 5.44B | 1.05B | 520% |
BFH | TALO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TALO's Valuation (75) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BFH (87) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that TALO’s stock grew similarly to BFH’s over the last 12 months.
BFH's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TALO (100) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TALO’s over the last 12 months.
BFH's SMR Rating (7) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for TALO (88) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew significantly faster than TALO’s over the last 12 months.
BFH's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as TALO (54) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to TALO’s over the last 12 months.
BFH's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for TALO (99) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew significantly faster than TALO’s over the last 12 months.
| BFH | TALO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
TALO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TALO has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TALO jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TALO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TALO | 100% | -3.28% | ||
| MTDR - TALO | 83% Closely correlated | -2.64% | ||
| DVN - TALO | 82% Closely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| PR - TALO | 82% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| SM - TALO | 81% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| NOG - TALO | 81% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
More | ||||