Advertisement
BFLBF vs VCISF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFLBF is a Buy and VCISF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFLBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVCISF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BFLBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- VCISF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFLBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VCISF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFLBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
- VCISF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BFLBF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VCISF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +473.08%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+1.70% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| BFLBF | VCISF | BFLBF / VCISF | |
| Capitalization | 4.1B | 78.7B | 5% |
| EBITDA | 301M | 12.8B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | 125.364 | 41.840 | 300% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.95 | 14.81 | 128% |
| Revenue | 5.22B | 72.8B | 7% |
| Total Cash | 533M | 16.2B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 370M | 36.3B | 1% |
BFLBF | VCISF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BFLBF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as VCISF (64). This means that BFLBF’s stock grew similarly to VCISF’s over the last 12 months.
BFLBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VCISF (37). This means that BFLBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VCISF’s over the last 12 months.
BFLBF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VCISF (99). This means that BFLBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VCISF’s over the last 12 months.
BFLBF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as VCISF (49). This means that BFLBF’s stock grew similarly to VCISF’s over the last 12 months.
BFLBF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as VCISF (30). This means that BFLBF’s stock grew similarly to VCISF’s over the last 12 months.
| BFLBF | VCISF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 34% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 9% | 1 day ago 39% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 7% | 1 day ago 24% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 28% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 31% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 37% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | N/A |
Advertisement
BFLBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BFLBF and DNERF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFLBF and DNERF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFLBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFLBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DNERF - BFLBF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLDD - BFLBF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
| ELWSF - BFLBF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WSPOF - BFLBF | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.92% | ||
| VCISF - BFLBF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||
VCISF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VCISF has been loosely correlated with CHYCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VCISF jumps, then CHYCY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VCISF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VCISF | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| CHYCY - VCISF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VCISY - VCISF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| MYRG - VCISF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| AMRC - VCISF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
| DY - VCISF | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
More | ||||