BFLY
Price
$1.97
Change
-$0.11 (-5.29%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
216.46M
5 days until earnings call
ECIA
Price
$0.37
Change
+$0.03 (+8.82%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFLY vs ECIA

Header iconBFLY vs ECIA Comparison
Open Charts BFLY vs ECIABanner chart's image
Butterfly Network
Price$1.97
Change-$0.11 (-5.29%)
Volume$3M
Capitalization216.46M
Encision
Price$0.37
Change+$0.03 (+8.82%)
Volume$400
Capitalization5.41M
BFLY vs ECIA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFLY vs. ECIA commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFLY is a Hold and ECIA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BFLY: $1.97 vs. ECIA: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: BFLY and ECIA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFLY: 76% vs. ECIA: 30%
Market capitalization -- BFLY: $216.46M vs. ECIA: $5.41M
BFLY [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $216.46M. ECIA’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $5.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileECIA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ECIA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BFLY and ECIA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECIA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ECIA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ECIA is a better buy in the short-term than BFLY.

Price Growth

BFLY (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +5.35% price change this week, while ECIA (@Medical Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

ECIA is expected to report earnings on Jul 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+3.05% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFLY($216M) has a higher market cap than ECIA($5.41M). ECIA YTD gains are higher at: -18.667 vs. BFLY (-36.859). ECIA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -529.03K vs. BFLY (-123.04M). BFLY has more cash in the bank: 134M vs. ECIA (120K). ECIA has less debt than BFLY: ECIA (976K) vs BFLY (25M). BFLY has higher revenues than ECIA: BFLY (65.9M) vs ECIA (7.15M).
BFLYECIABFLY / ECIA
Capitalization216M5.41M3,990%
EBITDA-123.04M-529.03K23,258%
Gain YTD-36.859-18.667197%
P/E RatioN/A47.17-
Revenue65.9M7.15M922%
Total Cash134M120K111,667%
Total Debt25M976K2,561%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECIA: Fundamental Ratings
ECIA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFLYECIA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCPPF0.35N/A
+0.93%
S4 Capital PLC
TTHG0.13N/A
N/A
Titanium Holdings Group, Inc.
HXGBF10.86N/A
N/A
Hexagon AB
SGAMY5.14-0.08
-1.53%
Sega Sammy Holdings, Inc.
MBKL21.51-0.37
-1.69%
MBT Bancshares, Inc.

BFLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFLY has been loosely correlated with NNOX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFLY jumps, then NNOX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFLY
1D Price
Change %
BFLY100%
-5.29%
NNOX - BFLY
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CERS - BFLY
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
CLPT - BFLY
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
ALGN - BFLY
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NTRA - BFLY
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
More

ECIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECIA and RDNT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECIA and RDNT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECIA
1D Price
Change %
ECIA100%
N/A
RDNT - ECIA
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
QTRX - ECIA
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.17%
SEMHF - ECIA
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
HBIO - ECIA
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
BFLY - ECIA
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.29%
More