BFNH
Price
$0.86
Change
+$0.34 (+65.38%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
28.83M
BMBOY
Price
$12.32
Change
+$0.43 (+3.62%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
12.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFNH vs BMBOY

Header iconBFNH vs BMBOY Comparison
Open Charts BFNH vs BMBOYBanner chart's image
BioForce Nanosciences Holdings
Price$0.86
Change+$0.34 (+65.38%)
Volume$100
Capitalization28.83M
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V
Price$12.32
Change+$0.43 (+3.62%)
Volume$100
Capitalization12.94B
BFNH vs BMBOY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BFNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BMBOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFNH vs. BMBOY commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFNH is a Hold and BMBOY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BFNH: $0.86 vs. BMBOY: $12.32)
Brand notoriety: BFNH and BMBOY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFNH: 6% vs. BMBOY: 9%
Market capitalization -- BFNH: $28.83M vs. BMBOY: $12.94B
BFNH [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $28.83M. BMBOY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $12.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFNH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBMBOY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BFNH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BMBOY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMBOY is a better buy in the long-term than BFNH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFNH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BMBOY’s TA Score has 9 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFNH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BMBOY’s TA Score: 9 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMBOY is a better buy in the short-term than BFNH.

Price Growth

BFNH (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while BMBOY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +7.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1016.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.96% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMBOY($12.9B) has a higher market cap than BFNH($28.8M). BFNH YTD gains are higher at: 151.801 vs. BMBOY (20.449). BMBOY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 58.1B vs. BFNH (-493.08K). BMBOY has more cash in the bank: 8.12B vs. BFNH (13.8K). BFNH has less debt than BMBOY: BFNH (834K) vs BMBOY (193B). BMBOY has higher revenues than BFNH: BMBOY (427B) vs BFNH (0).
BFNHBMBOYBFNH / BMBOY
Capitalization28.8M12.9B0%
EBITDA-493.08K58.1B-0%
Gain YTD151.80120.449742%
P/E RatioN/A21.35-
Revenue0427B-
Total Cash13.8K8.12B0%
Total Debt834K193B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFNH vs BMBOY: Fundamental Ratings
BFNH
BMBOY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8428
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
10068
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1967
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMBOY's Valuation (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFNH (95). This means that BMBOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFNH’s over the last 12 months.

BMBOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFNH (100). This means that BMBOY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFNH’s over the last 12 months.

BMBOY's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as BFNH (100). This means that BMBOY’s stock grew similarly to BFNH’s over the last 12 months.

BFNH's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BMBOY (50). This means that BFNH’s stock grew similarly to BMBOY’s over the last 12 months.

BFNH's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMBOY (67). This means that BFNH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMBOY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFNHBMBOY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BMBOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHC43.920.09
+0.21%
Schwab International Small-Cap Eq ETF™
KLMT29.12N/A
N/A
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
LBAY24.89-0.06
-0.23%
Leatherback Long/Short Alt Yld ETF
RPAR20.07-0.06
-0.30%
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
STXG48.17-0.14
-0.30%
Strive 1000 Growth ETF

BFNH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BFNH and ASBFY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFNH and ASBFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFNH
1D Price
Change %
BFNH100%
N/A
ASBFY - BFNH
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
BMBOY - BFNH
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BABB - BFNH
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
CFEIY - BFNH
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYCBF - BFNH
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BMBOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMBOY and GRBMF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMBOY and GRBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMBOY
1D Price
Change %
BMBOY100%
N/A
GRBMF - BMBOY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - BMBOY
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
BABB - BMBOY
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
BFNH - BMBOY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRRLY - BMBOY
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More