Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFONX vs RGACX
BFONX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BFONX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.19
Change+$0.60 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
BFONX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFONX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFONX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. BFONX (50.3M). BFONX pays higher dividends than RGACX: BFONX (0.21) vs RGACX (0.07). BFONX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BFONX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BFONX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BFONX (14.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFONX: RGACX (250) vs BFONX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.32 vs. BFONX (-6.24). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 43.39 vs. BFONX (2.83).
| BFONX | RGACX | BFONX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.94 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.94 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.139 | 17.502 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.3M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.07 | 297% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.24 | 16.32 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.05 | 60.40 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.83 | 43.39 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.16 | 99.34 | 39% |